apparently Murdoch isn't even legally able to support him
142 days
"If I stood, it would not be against Davis as such because I have no wish to be elected to Parliament and get stuck in that irrelevant web of deceit and corruption. I couldn’t take my seat anyway because I would never go through the pathetic ritual of pledging my ‘allegiance’ to the Queen because she is a giant lizard.
I would be supporting the stand of Davis against the Orwellian State and I would want him to win the seat and let him be a voice against the Big Brother society in Parliament."
That doesn't really make for much of a contest though does it?
I knew that, I was just pointing out that over and above it being Icke he wants to lose as well and says that even if he does win he won't take his place in parliament.My last comment should've been written with a wink, but it seemed unnecessary - it was about Icke, after all.
Just testing to see who was paying attention."Did you add the bit about the lizard IdleRich?"
Just testing to see who was paying attention.
i'd like to say that was the last time i ever touched the drug, but...
Fuck that. It'd only be a matter of time before the information was inevitable flogged off to health insurance companies so they can refuse insurance to, or impose huge premiums on, people with this or that gene, or employers weeding out people with undesirable 'predispositions'.
Also, as a commentator on the piece points out, DNA evidence does not, by itself, prove that a rape took place: it proves two people had sex
Fuck that.
It's precisely the kind of infantilising authoritarian idea of a relationship between people and state and justice that causes society to be so fucked up that you have that level of sexual violence in the first place.