a conservative viewpoint
Christopher Booker wrote a book called The Neophiliacs: A Study of the Revolution in English life in the Fifties and Sixties - it was published in 1969 and is well worth a look, despite - or rather because - his take is so unsympathetic.,
The overall theme is the idea of Sixties neophilia as a kind of collective national hysteria, a mass delusion, a mirage caused by the media that became self-perpetuating, stoking an appetite for shocks of the new and breaks with tradition... leading to an upward-spiraling demand for change that couldn't be satisified, short of revolution. It could only crash and burn into bitterness and disillusionment. Brooker is a persuasive enough writer that even a "Sixties fan" like myself began to feel like it was all quite insane. At the same time, you gradually become aware that his worldview is basically Christian - i'm guessing in the high Anglican tradition, moderation in all things, non-fervent. He views society as ideally homeostatic, things should change very very slowly indeed, and perhaps not at all. Things were better, people were happier, when everyone knew their place.... the right attitude to have is humility and fatalistic acceptance of your God-given lot, rather than striving to get above yourself or shake things up.
Curiously, Booker was a player in the British Sixties early on as one of the writers on That Was the Week That Was, so he was instrumental in the whole Sixties satire boom - that show broke ground in terms of its irreverence towards authority (e.g. David Frost for instance famously impersonated the Prime Minister Harold Macmillan - something deemed unthinkably disrespectful in 1962 or whenever it was). But by the time of writing The Neophiliacs, Booker has switched over to the other side and the satire boom is something he criticises.
But then he criticizes everything: fashion, the cult of photographers, commercial TV, the dissolving of class barriers, permissiveness, the Pill, feminism...
America gets blamed for a lot - rock'n'roll obviously, but also for the arrival of supermarkets in the U.K. And if I recall right he blames US influence for the liberalisation of gambling laws, with casinos opening in London for the first time. Another thing he doesn't approve of is James Bond movies: the glamorising of sex and violence (which Bond clearly enjoys).