IdleRich
IdleRich
Slightly higher than a live brexiter... but who would wanna eat one of those?What IS the IQ of a dead octopus anyway?
Case closed.
(Sorry - I literally cannot help myself)
Slightly higher than a live brexiter... but who would wanna eat one of those?What IS the IQ of a dead octopus anyway?
Case closed.
What about a human who flunked out of school with half a GNVQ?
Isn't the farming bad for the environment?
Isn't the farming bad for the environment?
Isn't the farming bad for the environment?
Cattle farming is a majorish source of methane, which is a potent greenhouse gas - although the extent of this is often overstated, I mean I've even seen people call it the 'main' source of GHG emissions; in reality it's dwarfed by the real biggies (fossil fuels used for electricity, heating and road transport; construction; heavy industry).
But 'red meat' also includes meat from sheep and pigs, which are almost negligible sources of GHGs.
The article says it's bad for the environment and bad for your health.
Clearly scolding, finger wagging, nose-holding, pearl clutching, prigishness and hypocrisy isn't helping anyone.
Cattle, farmed correctly, are Carbon-negative.
I'm not sure I get this. What's accounting for the big negative number listed as "soil carbon"? Cattle can't possibly put more carbon back into the soil than is extracted from the soil by the plants that they eat, can they?
And even if there were some theoretical way of farming cattle so as to act as an overall carbon sink, the fact remains that cattle farming is in general not being done like this.
(the new research is saying that the negative health impacts are marginal, and that the evidence for them is statistically quite weak)
That's true Hmg, for the lower orders. The cannon fpdder class. The humpers and haulers of heavy goods. Not for the spiritual aristocracy like myself, the Brahmin class. Meat inteferes with our delicate instruments.