without wanting to take down any sacred cows.
ok, so i agree with the conceptual premise. the left is still (mostly) trapped in the petrified bourgeois values of the 1950s.
What I don't agree with however is its conceptual premise. Do we really want to reclaim the acrid stink of the beatles and pink floyd, especially as truly psychedelic music (imo, at least a non-pastoral psychedelia) came after psych rock? What sort of futurism and destructive insurectionary alchemical transformation can exist in that hoary old genre? communists must negate the avant-garde and realise the occult. the existence of god and the transcendent will be a matter of complete indifference in the unitary collective organism. we will all be on ayahuasca!
ok, so i agree with the conceptual premise. the left is still (mostly) trapped in the petrified bourgeois values of the 1950s.
What I don't agree with however is its conceptual premise. Do we really want to reclaim the acrid stink of the beatles and pink floyd, especially as truly psychedelic music (imo, at least a non-pastoral psychedelia) came after psych rock? What sort of futurism and destructive insurectionary alchemical transformation can exist in that hoary old genre? communists must negate the avant-garde and realise the occult. the existence of god and the transcendent will be a matter of complete indifference in the unitary collective organism. we will all be on ayahuasca!