Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 49

Thread: Chess

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    7,774

    Default Chess

    Anyone play chess? I used to play a fair bit when I was a kid but haven't played for years (apart from the odd game every now and again) but when I was in Paris last week I started getting into it again. My friend has a market stall and I kept him company and passed the time between customers by playing game after game of chess - he hasn't really played much before so I won fairly easily but it was still fun. Then some random guy came and challenged me and we had quite a good tussle. Although I have to admit that there is some kind of law of diminishing returns in my enjoyment of the game and I think that when I play it too much and get beyond a certain proficiency I begin to get tired of the same old openings and get too worried about losing to play properly. It's a strange game in that way.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    8,538

    Default

    Yeah, know far too much about it, played when I was a kid - appeals to something inbetween scientific and artistic in my mind.

    I used to enjoy having a few games on yahoo now and then when I was bored, but they seem to have changed it all around now so that it's much more dificult to log into a room with a chance of getting a quick game. Any other internet sites anyone knows?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    7,774

    Default

    Um, my friend was using one yesterday, I'll find out what it was. Think some of my other friends used to play one that made a pun on the way that pawn is a homonym for porn.
    edit: apparently that should be a homophone
    Last edited by IdleRich; 28-06-2011 at 05:13 PM.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    15,888

    Default

    I like chess but the only person I ever really play it with is Abooda and he's unlikely to come back to the UK any time soon. I suppose I should just buy a cheap 2nd hand set from somewhere and see if anyone fancies a game now and then. I'd be well up for a game with you some time, Rich, though I have to say I am pretty bad.

    I'm reading all about the inherent problems with AI in particular with regard to chess in Goedel, Escher, Bach at the moment. It's interesting because when it was written (late '70s) the best computer programs on the best computers could reliably beat competent human players but were no match for the world-class players. Then it was this seismic event when Deep Blue beat Kasparov in the '90s. And now a chess program that costs a few quid and runs on an ordinary home PC or laptop can beat the world champion. I think this says a lot more about the increase in power of computers than it does about great leaps forward in AI, though.

    Quote Originally Posted by IdleRich View Post
    I begin to get tired of the same old openings...
    Tell me about it - bane of my sex life. Until I met your mum, anyway.
    Doin' the Lambeth Warp New: DISSENSUS - THE NOVEL - PM me your email address and I'll add you

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    7,774

    Default

    "I like chess but the only person I ever really play it with is Abooda and he's unlikely to come back to the UK any time soon. I suppose I should just buy a cheap 2nd hand set from somewhere and see if anyone fancies a game now and then. I'd be well up for a game with you some time, Rich, though I have to say I am pretty bad."
    I'm up for it yeah. But you could play Abooda online though couldn't you? Unless he cheats like that thing with Olaf.

    "I'm reading all about the inherent problems with AI in particular with regard to chess in Goedel, Escher, Bach at the moment. It's interesting because when it was written (late '70s) the best computer programs on the best computers could reliably beat competent human players but were no match for the world-class players. Then it was this seismic event when Deep Blue beat Kasparov in the '90s. And now a chess program that costs a few quid and runs on an ordinary home PC or laptop can beat the world champion. I think this says a lot more about the increase in power of computers than it does about great leaps forward in AI, though."
    Yeah, my (half-remembered) understanding is that the reason a top level player (Kasparov say) could beat a chess computer that could compute thousands of moves is that the player only looks at two or three moves through a kind of instinct/experience whereas the computer has to consider them all.
    So, Kasparov looks at maybe three moves, each of those will leave the computer, say, three moves that are potentially worthwhile and so on so for him to see four moves (in total) into the future he really only needs to deal with 3x3x3x3 = 81 moves. They never figured out a way for the computer to make the immediate dismissal of all the rubbish moves so it has to consider 20 odd moves per time so to look four moves into the future it has to evaluate 20x20x20x20 = 160,000 moves.
    I don't think that they ever solved the problem of how to make a computer think like Kasparov at the start, they made one that could evaluate billions of moves, so yeah, just number crunching.
    I understand Go and Bridge are the two games that they can't get a computer to do well at at all (or at least, that was the case last time I read about these things). Any idea why that is?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    7,774

    Default

    "I once made the mistake of playing chess against a woman in her mid 30's with an NPD when I was 12. I beat her so she played me nonstop until she beat me, goading me the whole time, making snide comments and generally trying to put me off. Was pretty horrible."
    What's an NPD?
    Reminds me of when Short and Kasparov played and Short flew in Kasparov's ex-girlfriend to be in the crowd in the hope that it would put him off. He just got massacred though.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    2,636

    Default

    Yeah, I used to play but pretty much gave up at uni because I didn't have time to be any good and it's not much fun being rubbish.

    I've played a few times more recently. I've found a clock is a good investment, because a) it means that you don't have to worry about a game dragging on for hours, if you want to bash it out in five minutes you can, b) you stop getting annoyed about the other player spending ages when it's a quick friendly game and c) it gives you an easy way of levelling the odds between unevenly matched players.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    7,774

    Default

    Well, I think that's what I enjoyed in Paris, it was a lazy, fairly sunny day on a market stall, smoking cigarettes and drinking the odd espresso while playing chess and occasionally selling something. If he took ages I could go for a walk or whatever - maybe that's the way that chess is best enjoyed.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    15,888

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by IdleRich View Post
    I understand Go and Bridge are the two games that they can't get a computer to do well at at all (or at least, that was the case last time I read about these things). Any idea why that is?
    Combinatorics, probably. In the case of Go, anyway (I have no idea how Bridge works). Although there's only one kind of playing piece in Go compared to six in chess, each player gets 180 of them, potentially all of which can be used, on a board with 361 (=19 x 19) positions, compared to just 64 squares on a chessboard. After just a couple of turns, the number of possible games becomes astronomical, much faster even than chess. Also consider that in chess the number of possible distinct board states initially increases but will after a while decrease as the game progresses and pieces are taken, while in Go the players continually add pieces to the board, so the informatic content of the game state can only increase. Edit: actually, it'd probably peak when each player has played 2/3 of their pieces.

    That's funny about Short and Kasparaov's ex, what a sneaky (although ultimately unsuccessful) bastard, haha.

    Did I tell you about the time I played after eating those red toadstools I picked in Epping forest, and the only noticeable effect was to - seemingly - make me temporarily amazing at chess? Well, I dunno about 'amazing' but I think I probably played the two best games of my life. Could have been complete coincidence, of course.
    Last edited by Mr. Tea; 28-06-2011 at 09:55 PM.
    Doin' the Lambeth Warp New: DISSENSUS - THE NOVEL - PM me your email address and I'll add you

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    7,774

    Default

    "Combinatorics, probably. In the case of Go, anyway (I have no idea how Bridge works). Although there's only one kind of playing piece in Go compared to six in chess, each player gets 180 of them, potentially all of which can be used, on a board with 361 (=19 x 19) positions, compared to just 64 squares on a chessboard. After just a couple of turns, the number of possible games becomes astronomical, much faster even than chess. Also consider that the number of distinct board states decreases as a game of chess progresses, as pieces are taken, while in Go the players add pieces to the board."
    I don't really know how to play Go but I understood that it was more than combinatorics that made it difficult. Also, that's not quite true of chess is it? At first the number of moves increases eg on your first move you can move the pawns to one of sixteen places plus there are four knight moves which gives you a total of twenty. But on your next move you may be able to make all except one of those moves plus a further six or seven with your bishop and queen.
    I should read more about Go though - how many pieces start on the board and how many do you add each time? That obviously affects how many moves there are at each stage. Also, don't you change the colours if you surround their pieces a bit like in Othello?

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    7,774

    Default

    Oh, sorry, I didn't see that you said it initially increases in chess.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    7,774

    Default

    Or did you edit it you sneaky bast?

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    15,888

    Default

    Yeah, sorry, I edited it.

    Well with Go you also have to consider the inherent Oriental inscrutability of it...

    I've only played it once but stones stay in position once played. Points are scored by surrounding your opponent's stones to 'capture' them. Another big difference with chess is that at the end of the game each player has a numerical score (which can be calculated according to different conventions: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Go_%28game%29#Scoring_rules ) and the player with the highest score wins. Whereas in chess the outcome is not quantified in the same way.

    I've got a Go set if you fancy, uh, giving it a go.
    Last edited by Mr. Tea; 28-06-2011 at 06:19 PM.
    Doin' the Lambeth Warp New: DISSENSUS - THE NOVEL - PM me your email address and I'll add you

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    leicester
    Posts
    1,756

    Default

    i would love to play more chess but it's finding a partner that's the problem.

    ai opponents don't really cut the mustard. they take their goes so quickly you don't have the delight of time considering what they may do.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    7,774

    Default

    "I've got a Go set if you fancy, uh, giving it a go."
    Yeah, I've always fancied it - although not enough to actually get round to making it happen. Let's do it.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •