Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 36

Thread: Can computer games be art?

  1. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    192

    Default

    I don't believe art has to be expressing something. The only example i can think off the top of my head now is Toshimaru Nakamura saying that he doesn't want to express anything. Would you thereby classify his music and indeed all of Jap improv as 'not art'?. I agree there are differences between art and entertainment, of course there are differences between the latest action blockbuster and an arthouse film, obviously the latter is expressive, richer and sensitive (ie 'artier') than the former. If one is made for financial gain is it constituted as 'not art'? An indeed, if one brings that into question, isn't most art nowadays made for consumption to at least some degree?

    I guess what i'm saying is is that nowadays Art with a big A has come to mean a certain type of art with a small A, a type like Matt suggested. Because we can make this differentiation, isn't questioning whether or not something is Art seem a bit silly because it there is (surprise surprise) basically no dichotomy between the supposed difference between Art and non-Art art. There will always be argument between people about this topic usually over petty things like whether or not something actually LIKES the work. For instance, Person A says GTA is Art because he likes the game and generally calling something art gives it credit, but person B says its not Art because they don't like computer games. Its never-ending, and i think its rather silly, but nevertheless feel the need everytime it is raised to explain that if you question whether or not something is art, it generally always will be.

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    192

    Default

    Sorry for that rather ridiculous rant. Will make sure next time not to collapse into such a stupid, boring and passe argument. Hah

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    London
    Posts
    982

    Default

    Been meaning to get back to this thread for quite a while now. Certainly agree computer games can be art, but the more I think about it, I don't know how it happens. As Woebot says, computer games with an arty twist tend to be atrocious, and I'd venture to add that it's some of the most blood thirsty, mindless ones (GTA, Quake, Resident Evil) that actually have the most cultural resonance.

    But noone, let alone the computer games manufactures seem to be able to figure out how it happens.

    Agree that "expressing" isn't what computer games do. Let's take another tack- perhaps computer games, like films, synthesize various cultural viewpoints together, they subconsciously provide solutions, dream up utopias to perceived problems with real society. Thus just as saving a bunch of children in movies often suggest fantasies of a better tommorow, the many rescue missions in computer games suggest a similar viewpoint. Except how does this explain that these days, all arcades are full of House Of The Dead and racing games (whatever happened to good arcade games?).

    Dunno where I'm going with this. Cultural studies probably.

  4. Default

    Back when i was at college i was paid to debug playstation games for two consecutive summers. This was for SQUARE, and the games were stuff like FINAL FANTASY. i have real difficulty appreciating 95% of computer games. But the other 5% provide the kind of immersive experiences that cannot be found in non-interactive media, and i think these experiences stay with you on some level. certainly as profound as any stagnant gallery experience, or so called 'visual art' encounter. i would strongly recommend the recent release UPLINK, where the gamer takes the character of a hacker. You need to hack the game itself in order to progress. ace idea.

    presenting an open system to someone seems far more exciting than presenting the resolution of a single artist's particular discursive contrivances.

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Naaaarwich
    Posts
    56

    Default

    Games are becoming more and more like showcases for art/music. Two types of games: The epic adventures like Metal Gear Solid and Final Fantasy always come with a great score, perfectly suited to the situation. Then there's the adrenaline rush games like GTA and Need for Speed: Underground, with modern, "trendy" music like hip-hop or house as a soundtrack.

    Music is becoming more and more of an integral part in the gaming industry; and the industry knows about. When I'm interested in purchasing a game (moreso with role playing games), I try to get as much info about the soundtrack as I can (even before I read the specifications ). I've got pure game soundtracks on my mp3 player and listen to 'em whenever cuz it's damn good.

    Gaming is possibly one of the -if not The most- most popular forms of art for the youth of today (youth being pre-16).
    -Dan

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Wilmington
    Posts
    1

    Thumbs up openness

    Quote Originally Posted by joanofarctan
    presenting an open system to someone seems far more exciting than presenting the resolution of a single artist's particular discursive contrivances.
    I quite agree, joanofarctan. Might go even further and say the openness you describe is a pretty workable distinction between art and not-art (and not just between good and bad art or exciting and unexciting): A work's "willingness" to be interpreted, its receptivity. We say that works in any medium, arty or otherwise, are pedantic or trite or not-art when they fail to kick off the kind of personalized interpretation or assimilation that art does/can, when they don't put you in the driver's seat, or when they seem to have already reached their conclusions before you showed up. You might say "closed" games are guilty of a similar kind of artlessness.

    I'm not much of a gamer, but this discussion also makes me think of "arty" self-conscious adult movies like Caligula, which in my view were rendering unto Caesar what was not Caesar's--and ruining two basic forms at once!

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    26,678

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by craner View Post
    Of course, Out Run was High Art. Particualrly in the arcades, on the machines that swerved like a real car.
    1181242142228-e1422635711476.jpg

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Posts
    20

    Default

    Definitely, they can be art. First, video games here have graphics. These can be compared to paintings or movies (since video game graphics often move). While some video games might not actually hit a level that would qualify them as art (not even bad art) at least some of them would seem to be adequately similar to paintings, drawings or films in ways that would qualify the visual component as art.
    Last edited by kevinoak; 28-10-2019 at 10:31 AM.

  9. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to kevinoak For This Useful Post:


  10. #24
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    Copenhagen
    Posts
    356

    Default

    Forcing video games to compete on the terms of other mediums like movies take all the fun out of them, but I remember playing that The Last of Us and thinking how brilliant the story telling and voice acting was.

  11. #25
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    9,547

    Default

    The gameplay itself is a form of artistry. The stuff that resembles movies is easier for people to praise cos it resembles movies/books. But the mechanics of Mario Odyssey, e.g., are artistic in of themselves.
    Αι ψυχαί οσμώνται καθ΄ Άιδην.

  12. #26
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    On the bus
    Posts
    1,669

    Default

    Original half life bitd felt like being in a film. The script was incredible
    Took a rest stop that wasn't on the schedule

  13. #27
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    5,466

    Default


  14. The Following User Says Thank You to version For This Useful Post:


  15. #28
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    26,678

    Default

    I don't think rockstar are as cute as they used to be at reading and commenting on the social situation it's harder to play some of the games they're used to playing now. The terrain is trickier I think this is cackhanded in a way I don't think gta was.

  16. #29
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    26,678

    Default

    You lot aren't in a talking mood. Sullen. Morose. Shifty.

  17. #30
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    9,159

    Default

    Thanks for posting this Version, I was intrigued enough to look at the run-through on youtube. I can definitely see the appeal of this one. As I looked at the other highly-rated video games of recent years - given that I don't think I've played any video games except football ones (and GTA once or twice) since I was 18* - what was noticeable was how recognisable all these games were to me, how much sense they made. It's odd, I didn't feel anywhere near as alienated by them as I imagined I would as an old person.

    * and I grew up spending masses of time playing computer games til the age of 14 or so)

    Quote Originally Posted by version View Post

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •