Both of you are full of it.
Ive read that Europol report from cover to cover. Its not 'disingenuous'. It starts in 2006 because thats when they started collecting data.
You've completely failed to grasp the basic fact that the survey was completed not by some 'self-loathing pro-islamist lefties', but by an official conservative European security organisation.
You can argue about the definition of 'terrorism' or the number or severity of attacks, or you could include 'allegations' by the UK security services, or you could take account of the fact that since 2011 ALL religiously motivated attacks are included in the 'Islamist' category, or you could make statements like:
They are openly and transparently propagandising for the jihadis - and so are you by posting it here. That's all there is to it.
So
Europol is 'openly and transparently propagandising for the jihadis'?
Seriously?
What is wrong with you? This is the very definition of reactionary.
Of course it was motherfucking Islamists.
Thats what they said immediately after Brevik as well wasnt it? More to the point thats exactly what
you thought, because, as we all know, Islam has a monopoly on terror.