TBF the standard of evidence against him isn't amazing: a non-dom millionaire peer who has it in for him claims that he once spoke to an unnamed MP who said that he saw a picture. This is probably why a lot of the press aren't going all out with it either.
Here's another decent bit about what all this actually means in relation to class and political elites:
http://theleveller.org/2015/09/british-really-laughing/
Cameron’s best bet might be to seek refuge in a kosher deli. In the West Bank. For about 50 billion years.
A loftier precept looms large: A wealthy man cannot be allowed to mortify the Prime Minister from office simply because someone told him No. When the chortling dies down, and Twitter moves on to its next distraction, we will have to begin a serious conversation about the power of the mega-rich in Britain. If Lord Ashcroft felt entitled to a senior ministerial role because of his bulging wallet, then that is intolerable. It is a short walk from the Cabinet room to the Prime Minister’s office.
Come on, you've gratuitously added the "...before things go too far".
If we're talking about slurs and smears, the situation as far as I can see is:
There is as yet no hard evidence Jeremy Corbyn is best buds with anti-Semitic loonies, but people are saying it nonetheless.
There is as yet no hard evidence David Cameron got dead-pig-head 30-odd years ago, but people are saying it nonetheless.
Obviously, I'd very much love the former to be untrue and the latter to be true. Yes, the press (including those parts of it that are supposedly left-wing) have gone for Corbyn in predictably predatory fashion but that doesn't cancel out the fact that the sole reason everyone is making necro-bestiality jokes about an incumbent Prime Minister is because a multi-millionaire felt short-changed over the position he was offered in return for huge financial support to the Tory party.
looked at Facebook on my phone on Monday morning it was wall-to-wall pigfuckery, and I hadn't even got out of bed!
But surely this is the norm for you?
Well, yes, the British press is overwhelmingly conservative, obviously. But I wonder if the official press, as powerful as it still is, is *as* powerful as it was a generation ago? Consider how quickly Pig-Gate has propagated via social media. You no longer need to read about something in the Times, Guardian or whatever, or watch it on the BBC or any other channel, to know it's going on. When I looked at Facebook on my phone on Monday morning it was wall-to-wall pigfuckery, and I hadn't even got out of bed!