Page 36 of 36 FirstFirst ... 26343536
Results 526 to 533 of 533

Thread: UK EU Referendum Aftermath

  1. #526
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    The Fear - Dublin
    Posts
    7,088

    Default

    So Aaron Banks just admitted to 'low level' Russian collusion with the Brexit leave campaign.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to droid For This Useful Post:


  3. #527
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    East Loondon
    Posts
    1,376

    Default

    The thing I'm wondering is where is the political leadership that's going to make capital from these revelations, though? May seems to be ignoring it like a bad fart no one will own up to. And Corbyn - derailing Brexit and criticising Russia in one fell swoop? No way. Hopefully this is going to get so big it can't get shoved under the carpet though.

  4. #528
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    East Loondon
    Posts
    1,376

    Default

    It's pretty massive though. I'm looking at Carole Caldwalla's tweet now. My first thought is - if this is what he's prepared to admit, under minimal pressure - what's the real story?

  5. #529
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    East Loondon
    Posts
    1,376

    Default

    She also have that yesterday's Times story actually came from Banks himself? What's the story there?

  6. #530
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    The Fear - Dublin
    Posts
    7,088

    Default

    They were about to get rumbled so they pulled a Don Jr. and decided to admit everything first.

  7. #531
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    The Fear - Dublin
    Posts
    7,088

    Default

    This seems reasonable:

    In the real world (outside the pages of fiction) only two types of conspiracy generally take place: cover-up and collusion. A cover-up generally happens when several people or groups stand to lose money or be politically embarrassed if an uncomfortable truth becomes public knowledge. See, for example, the Home Office shredding of historical records relating to the Windrush scandal lest they embarrass the Prime Minister, who was the Home Office minister who brought in the hostile environment immigration policy. And collusion generally takes place when a group of individuals or organizations stand to benefit from a course of action.

    Brexit was a classic example of a collusion conspiracy. Many of the named politicians and businessmen above stand to gain millions of pounds from a hard Brexit that causes the British stock market to fall. Others stand to make millions from juicy investment opportunities they were offered in Russia. We cannot know for certain what the quid pro quo for those investment deals were at this time, but I strongly suspect that support for Brexit (and more general socially-authoritarian right-wing policies) was part of it.

    And now we're seeing a rival collusion conspiracy surface. Not all billionaires stand to profit from seeing the remains of British industry sink beneath the waves, and not all of them are in the pocket of the Kremlin's financial backers. There are a bunch of very rich, rather reclusive men (and a handful of women) who probably thought, "well, let's sit back and see where this thing leads, for now" about 18 months ago. And now they can see it leading right over a cliff, and they are unhappy, and they have made their displeasure known on the golf course and in the smoke-filled rooms, and the quiet whispering campaign has finally turned heads at the top of the media empires.

    If I'm right, then over the next four to eight weeks the wrath of the British press is going to fall on the heads of the Brexit lobby with a force and a fury we haven't seen in a generation. There may be arrests and criminal prosecutions before this sorry tale is done: I'd be unsurprised to see money-laundering investigations, and possibly prosecutions under the Bribery Act (2010), launched within this time frame that will rumble on for years to come.

    Even if the momentum behind Brexit proves un-stoppable at this point, the Remain factionóin the shape of the corporate and political power groups who stand to lose their fortunes as a resultówill seek revenge.
    http://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog...the-pivot.html

  8. #532
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    15,600

    Default

    Yeah, not a bad piece - I assume the author is the same Charlie 'Robert E. Howard in a Lolcats T-shirt' Stross? - but this jumped out at me:

    Brexit requires no introduction at this point. Nor, I think, do the main UK media players. With the exception of two newspapers (The Daily Mirror and The Guardian) the national papers have been uniformly pro-Brexit to the extent of attacking national institutions seen as being soft on Brexit.
    I think The Times is broadly anti-Brexit, isn't it? Though not nearly as fervently as The Sun is pro-, of course.

    I could never quite get my head around these two papers taking opposing sides on this issue.
    Doin' the Lambeth Warp New: DISSENSUS - THE NOVEL - PM me your email address and I'll add you

  9. #533
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    لندورا
    Posts
    2,882

    Default

    Anyone marching today?

    Personally i think a 2nd referendum is as daft an idea as the first

    I went to eid on the square a couple of years ago to sample the worlds most expensive egyptian street food

    So i'n not going this year... updates please

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •