It's not just "someone" though, is it, it's people speaking on behalf of pressure groups. And it's a fairly widespread feminist position.
I didn't know who it was, cos afai could see, you hadn't linked to any evidence at the point at which I wrote that. So, women's rights groups and social policy makers, it was, says the article.
So it's a widespread position among feminists think that "any opposition to male circumcision is effectively an endorsement for FGM"? I think you'll need to back that one up with some evidence. Edit: I see someone beat me to that punch
And the person who's actually quoted in that article you linked to isn't identified as a feminist, but rather as a social policy maker, who happens to be a woman. So, is this a widespread social policy maker position as well?
To be honest, at this point, you look like you're fishing around for things to be outraged by, in precisely the same manner as you're criticising others (the 'social media echo chamber' people etc) for doing. Which links back to the original speech from Lionel Shriver, cos that was her schtick -the awful infringements upon her liberty that don't even exist, as she's free to write what she damn well pleases, and does so, no matter how offensive others find it.
And in the process of hunting out these outrages, you and she are totally misrepresenting the power balance in the actual world, presenting people from groups that have historically been discriminated against (non-white people, women), and continue to be the subject of mass discrimination, as the 'true' aggressors to be held to account.