Results 1 to 15 of 694

Thread: Dematerialisation.

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    16,049

    Default Dematerialisation.

    relinquish the earth-suit. no more Schuman the Human. show's cancelled people.

    i know, and dont need reminding that the first recorded music is the first real break here.i know dematerialisation doesn't begin with the digital. i also know the digital doesnt begin in the '00s
    and yet it seems reasonable to suggest we are in the process of acceleration.

    it wouldnt be unusual for a human of 2018 to wake up, reach blearily for phone, scroll through
    news feed, after shitting and showering return to phone over breakfast, stayed glued to phone
    throughout commute, get to work, put down phone and sit IN FRONT OF A COMPUTER SCREEN
    ALL DAY, phone over lunch, phone home, phone in bed before sleep.

    not to mention socialising on whatsapp and orgasms with pornhub.

    at that level of usage it is no exaggeration to say that SCREEN IS NOW PRIMARY ENVIRONMENT
    and that, like in the phantom tollbooth, the world outside is disappearing. (the screen doesn't begin
    with computers, the page is a screen. a painting is a screen. the screen always has a frame, is boundaried.)

    i've mentioned how architecture is dematerialising

    i suppose it blurs somewhat into the creation of and representation of purely digital spaces. and again i think this is where it's instructive to look towards architecture, which cant escape its physicality but looks to shed some of the more obvious signifiers of tactility and embodiment eg texture as it aspires to total dematerialisation. opaque glass. trespa. flat blocks of primary colour.

    these buildings reflect their digitality in the same inescapable and crashingly obvious way
    as computer music reflects its origins and the parameters of its creative programs.
    and simon's recent article on autotune nudged me into making a whole thread about this process
    https://pitchfork.com/features/artic...popular-music/

    also worth linking to the autotune thread
    http://www.dissensus.com/showthread.php?t=13199
    and the vr building thread
    http://www.dissensus.com/showthread....t=architecture

    it seems to me that once music making switched primarily to in-computer, and especially with the advent of autotune (and forgive me if this seems especially obvious/trite) sound no longer has a direct physical referent, and even the voice gets further and further away from the exigencies of breath of lung and tooth and tongue.

    and it also makes intuitive sense that people who live their lives in a screen would require a kind of screen music. dematerialised tunes for dematerialised people. lusting after digital bodies. meeting in disembodied space.

    i would never advocate any putting of the vehicle into reverse. we have the music of the past when we want physical referents. even something like dilla's dequantising (in the service of a fabricated organicism) seems retrograde. this is an area where i can happily be an accelerationist and want to see musicians lean into the process (not that they need any encouragement) and never look back

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to luka For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    16,049

    Default

    my good mate Jim was talking to me about becoming, in the nietzschean sense, this morning
    and it reminded me that to a large degree, information exists outside of that process
    is in a very real sense, outside of time. i've always maintained that is the magical aspect
    of writing. that it happens and exists outside of time.

    e.g.

    Here we can operate Outside of Time.

    Communicating across it and through it.

    Here we can trace conspiracies and forge counter-conspiracies of our own. Plots to assassinate kings and unseat potentates, redraw maps and reassign values.
    Remake experience.

    Swallows chase tiny flies into evening and clouds settle.

    AVOID TEMPTATION. HOLD TIGHT TO THESE TRUTHS.
    WRITER you have chosen, pre-game, before the beginning of time before the incarnation as all choose. Do you remember the room-outside-of-time?



    The WRITER has performed a ritual act of self-mutilation. His inability to act is the price paid for vision. It is a trade-off.
    WORDS ACT.
    ACT 1
    What we say is. The page is a rogue space. It is an act of will. Made manifest within world without being subject to world laws. This is how the writer acts. OUTSIDE OF TIME AND SPACE.
    Goetic trance.

    (The chamber-outside-time.)

    The chamber-outside-time is circular. The room is luxurious, opulent but not overbearingly so. A louche atmosphere. Faintly seedy. Intimate as a boudoir.
    In the middle of the room is the vision-bowl.
    -Wraith-like vapours rise from the vision-bowl.-
    There are pillows and divans surrounding the vision-bowl. To look into the vision bowl is to become transfixed by its visions.
    To become transfixed by the visions is to be incarnate. Within space-time.
    If, by some act of ferocious will or magical force a person manages to tear his gaze from the vision-bowl he will find himself back in the chamber-outside-time.

    Oh-ho! here again!
    A sense almost of vertigo, rush of recognition and remembrance as the chamber takes shape around you
    its contours becoming clearer, memories come into focus

    hologram
    within game
    At limits of game space. Replicates itself.
    Mirrors, srorriM
    wraps around self.

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    16,049

    Default

    obviously the physical language is still operative. e.g. sudden, short, loud
    still is on a spectrum of emphatic (fist banging on table, a sharp, forceful, blurted NO)
    to violence (gunshot, shell exploding, elbow shattering nose bone)

    but what is opened up? etc

    going over the park now, get a bit of this last late sunshine before the depression cage closes.
    see you later.

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    لندورا
    Posts
    2,949

    Default


  6. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to sufi For This Useful Post:


  7. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    THE YABBA
    Posts
    5,753

    Default

    Nothing to contribute but love this thread

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to mistersloane For This Useful Post:


  9. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    304

    Default

    This reminds me of the stuff we were discussing in that Wreck-It Ralph 2 thread a while back, you've got CG characters on screen who exist within screens in the world of the film as they're video game characters and they burrow even further by getting into the internet and interacting with characters from within other screens as well as referencing companies and products we interact with through screens irl.

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to version For This Useful Post:


  11. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    545

    Default left to their own devices

    Quote Originally Posted by luka View Post
    [I] SCREEN IS NOW PRIMARY ENVIRONMENT
    I've seen this play out with my own kids

    When they were little, they were like kids always have been - primarily physical beings, interested in what they could touch and handle. They enjoyed rough and tumble games, playing with toys, building things, making a mess, and games of role play and imagination. Indoors and outdoors.

    As soon as they got their hands on computers, tablets, and then later phones, it all shifted.

    The sense was that all the action was happening indoors, and more than that, inside the world opened up by these machines. Minecraft, YouTube etc etc

    You could drag them out on a hike, or involve them in some old skool type game - sport or board game or whatever, and they'd enjoy it. They would essentially revert to how they'd been pre-technology.

    But left to their own devices... they turned to their devices.

    What I noticed particularly with my son was that he didn't seem to have the same feeling for the exterior world that I had as a boy, growing up in a semi-rural bit of Hertfordshire with a lot of woods and common land that we'd roam.

    He wouldn't look up at the sky, remark on the shape of clouds and so forth.

    My daughter likewise - having once been quite sporty and into dancing - is likewise inclined to stay at home, curled up immobile with her phone, which is the gateway to all this stuff, pop videos, vlogs, YouTube challenges, etc.

    She drags her heels about going on a walk in the glorious canyons of LA, and I think it's because she doesn't want to leave this screen world. She wants to get back to it ASAP.

    Partly it's to do with adolescence and becoming introverted etc but i do think the allure of the screen world has stripped the exterior phenomenal world of its libidinal attraction.

    When she visits with her cousin in Silverlake, who is slightly younger and unusually has no interest in phones etc, she reverts to a younger self and it is delightful to see her playing physical games, dressing up, noisily filling up real space with activity.

    But most of the time, inside the screens, that's where it's at, for her.

    As for myself, I do think of getting a smartphone as a personal catastrophe. I'd seen it with friends who'd come to dinner but couldn't stop themselves pulling out the phone to check Facebook or whatever. For a long time I was like, "I'm not going to be that guy". I had one of those flip-top, rudimentary phones for the longest time. Then my wife practically forced her old iPhone on me. A decision she has come to regret with each passing day!

    I do think of the Internet etc as a cultural shift as massive as the invention of writing maybe.

    One thing where it plays out is the effect on memory.

    Because in any given day you are on a screen for nearly all of it - travelling this way and that across the infosphere - you can reach the end of the day and have very little recollection of what you did. Because you didn't really "do" anything, didn't "go" anywhere. All that time and information gathering or whatever just falls into a void.

    Which is why I've occasionally found myself blogging, sometimes almost word for word, the same blog entry on one of my nonsense blogs like Hardly Baked that I did four or five years earlier, because it was similarly impulse-blogged in response to some video I'd stumbled on at YouTube. I stumble on it again and the same mental responses, amusement/bemusement are triggered. Thanks to the amnesiac effect of internet life I've completely forgotten that I blogged it before.

    Perhaps that's why I'm getting a horrid feeling of deja vu - creeping suspicion that I have typed in thoughts similar to these at Dissensus before, on some earlier thread...

    I do wonder what storehouse of great personal memories is not being built up, owing to these huge expanses of time I've spent on the Internet...

    And what will my children's memories be of their youth when so much of it has been immaterial and interior?

    But perhaps it's no different to me spending thousands of hours with my nose in a book as a kid.
    Last edited by blissblogger; 27-09-2018 at 04:29 PM.

  12. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to blissblogger For This Useful Post:


  13. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    895

    Default

    the problem with autotune is that it is not cyborg enough. Zapp still sounds more radical at their best in that regard.

  14. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    16,049

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by thirdform View Post
    the problem with autotune is that it is not cyborg enough. Zapp still sounds more radical at their best in that regard.
    it think that makes it sound far more like the future-present though. cyborg is perhaps cooler sounding but the uncanny valley stuff is much more 2018. i think it's vastly more radical precisely because it doesn't depend on retro-cool. there's an ambiguity- am i drawn to this or am i utterly repelled and disturbed by it?
    it's the queasiness of it.

    and just to be clear this thread is not about like it/dont like it. like it/dont like it is rarely a good starting point for discussion. it doesnt go anywhere.

    its about tracking the progress
    of an event. something which is happening to reality and is affecting almost every sphere of human
    endevour, not just music and architecture, but we're mostly a music forum so it's in the music thread with a focus on music. it's probably the easiest way for us to think through it a bit.
    Last edited by luka; 27-09-2018 at 07:13 PM.

  15. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    16,049

    Default

    there's also a whole gamut of emotions or complexes of emotions that i think are peculiar to the internet and digitalisation and i think autotune is expressive of those things in a way vocoder can't be.
    barty said his favourite bit in the reynolds article was the bit about it sounding like cher's face looks and i agree. that's a good example of the uncanny valley. or the instagram filters, or the japanese photobooths which preceded and inspired the filters-the smoothing of the skin, the enlarging of the eyes etc etc (and which people now get injections, surgery etc to replicate)
    Last edited by luka; 27-09-2018 at 06:49 PM.

  16. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    16,049

    Default

    And what will my children's memories be of their youth when so much of it has been immaterial and interior?
    But perhaps it's no different to me spending thousands of hours with my nose in a book as a kid.
    this is perhaps all contingent on avoiding environmental collapse and maintaining (or increasing) current energy supply levels but i would assume/hope that there are skills being developed in terms of moving in an information realm that will be more important to them in the future than learning how to be good at hackey sack.

    you sort of have to assume it is preparation for a world currently in gestation.

  17. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    895

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by luka View Post
    it think that makes it sound far more like the future-present though. cyborg is perhaps cooler sounding but the uncanny valley stuff is much more 2018. i think it's vastly more radical precisely because it doesn't depend on retro-cool. there's an ambiguity- am i drawn to this or am i utterly repelled and disturbed by it?
    it's the queasiness of it.

    and just to be clear this thread is not about like it/dont like it. like it/dont like it is rarely a good starting point for discussion. it doesnt go anywhere.

    its about tracking the progress
    of an event. something which is happening to reality and is affecting almost every sphere of human
    endevour, not just music and architecture, but we're mostly a music forum so it's in the music thread with a focus on music. it's probably the easiest way for us to think through it a bit.

    I'm not repelled by it, i just find it boring. the internet isn't really anything new it's just spectacle surveillance technology. at least on internet 1.0 there was an anonimity, a desire to go beyond the classifications of this putrified society. internet 2.0 has reinstated the family in all of its forms, classic bourgeois nuclear or postmodern otherwise. there is nothing good about social networking, it's a tyranny of familiarity, not a disconnect with nature.

  18. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    895

    Default

    this is why the late k-punk was wrong imo, there was an alternative to capitalist realism. but that alternative was spectacle, the possible, the pragmatic.

  19. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    16,049

    Default

    ok. i guess that's the end of the discussion. the internet is nothing new. digitalisation hasn't happened. dematerialisation is a figment of my imagination. i've got a dvd to watch anyway.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •