Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 67

Thread: Novara Media

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    London
    Posts
    57

    Default Novara Media

    Aaron Bastani, Ash Sarkar etc.

    There is something that does not sit right with this lot.



    I first noticed them interacting with all the usual Verso intellectual brigade on twitter around four years ago, and since then their online following has soared. They are now in a position where they are appearing with regularity on the BBC, ITV, Sky, whilst Sarkar's twitter account has nearly as many followers as the official Momentum account. Bastani on the other hand has a book setting out his "Fully Automated Luxury Communism" idea forthcoming with Verso.



    What is their agenda within the broader spectrum of the left?
    What do those of you on here with socialist sympathies think of them?
    Why are they so sus?

    Maybe someone with a better grasp of the history of marxist groups in the UK can help shed some light on where they fit within the history of the left in this country.
    Last edited by Rudewhy; 12-10-2018 at 03:18 PM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    1,110

    Default

    they are just dumb historical reenactment society with absolutely fuck all relevance to the conditions of the w/c today.

    but if you can actually be bothered to take them seriously: they are communists in the pre-marxist sense, aka pre-capitalist communists. read up on babeuf and the conspiracy of equals and you'll see that that was the idealised form of the USSR.

    As for fully automated luxury communism, it's just spectacle and nothing else. drive capitalism to its inevitable contradictions and revolution will naturally result. again absolutely nothing marxist in this.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    1,110

    Default

    bastani just needs to stop plastering his spunk all over the verso offices and study the agrarian question in depth.

    of course this will mean he will not make any money (like me) and he probably won't become an MP, which is his aim, apparently.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    London
    Posts
    57

    Default

    Where did you read/hear that he wants to be an MP?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    North East London
    Posts
    5,827

    Default

    Every generation of young activists produces a new set of media pundits / columnists / authors / MPs.

    Novara came out of the student protests and the trajectory has been predictable but I've been surprised by its velocity.

    Bastani has gone from Black Bloc Anarcho to the Greens to Corbyn in about 8 years, which is remarkable.

    Novara's output has increased in technical quality with the funding they are getting but it's about 90% Labour party material now.

    The Lockdown podcast about prisons is good.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to john eden For This Useful Post:


  7. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    North East London
    Posts
    5,827

    Default

    I think in terms of where they fit into the left, there is a bit of having your cake and eating it going on.

    They want to attract Momentum types and people to its left - so they can simultaneously talk about communism, autonomism, base unions, UK Uncut and other radical/revolutionary bits whilst also droning on about social democracy and the internal machinations of the labour party.

    It's deliberately broad/inclusive and non-ideological so the point isn't about seeing what left tradition they come from - they don't. It's about developing an alternative left media (which is much needed) whilst promoting themselves as personalities and increasing their social (and actual) capital.

  8. #7

    Default

    Serious Q: can anyone give me a quick, 'guide for dummies' breakdown of what's sus about Novara?

    I haven't paid them much attention, assumed it was just lefty commentators - seem more self-aware and less laughable than Laurie " I'm going back to my hotel" Penny. What makes them different from other paid lefties like, I dunno, Mark Steel or George Monbiot, who I presume would get a thumbs-up? (or would they?)

    And what would an acceptable 'left media' look like?

  9. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    1,110

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by john eden View Post
    I think in terms of where they fit into the left, there is a bit of having your cake and eating it going on.

    They want to attract Momentum types and people to its left - so they can simultaneously talk about communism, autonomism, base unions, UK Uncut and other radical/revolutionary bits whilst also droning on about social democracy and the internal machinations of the labour party.

    It's deliberately broad/inclusive and non-ideological so the point isn't about seeing what left tradition they come from - they don't. It's about developing an alternative left media (which is much needed) whilst promoting themselves as personalities and increasing their social (and actual) capital.
    I can't see many people bouncing off them tho.

    When I was being radicalised the big guys in the game were AWL and SWP. neither of them dressed up their labour party/social democracy entryism in ultra-left language. so it was quite easy to tell em why i thought Lenin was wrong and Pankhurst was right, for instance.

    But with NM there's a whole streak of narcissistic 'you're not worth anything unless you're an activist' thing going on. the left has ignored nationalism, endorsement on one of their talks for Nasser, getting the IPPR involved and it just goes on. But they still advertise themselves as 'anarchists.' So it's pretty Stalinoid in that regard.

  10. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    1,110

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by martin View Post

    And what would an acceptable 'left media' look like?

    with their minds in the past but their gaze and hands firmly fixed on the future.

    Novara is the opposite. same with the inventing the future type lef accelerationists.

  11. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    London
    Posts
    57

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by martin View Post
    Serious Q: can anyone give me a quick, 'guide for dummies' breakdown of what's sus about Novara?
    It's the religious, preachy, style of presenting and the weird cult of personality that they're trying to cultivate around Bastani and Sarkar that particularly bothers me. They all come across as incredibly narcissistic (which, of course, isn't that odd for media personalities engaged in politics) but there is a feeling that, whether they admit it or not, they see themselves as a Leninist vanguard of the current moment.

  12. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    1,110

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rudewhy View Post
    It's the religious, preachy, style of presenting and the weird cult of personality that they're trying to cultivate around Bastani and Sarkar that particularly bothers me. They all come across as incredibly narcissistic (which, of course, isn't that odd for media personalities engaged in politics) but there is a feeling that, whether they admit it or not, they see themselves as a Leninist vanguard of the current moment.

    lol they aren't leninists. I'm not the biggest fan of Lenin but Lenin was far more nuanced in his thought than Bastani could ever hope to be.

    narcissism is about right tho.

  13. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    London
    Posts
    57

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by thirdform View Post
    lol they aren't leninists. I'm not the biggest fan of Lenin but Lenin was far more nuanced in his thought than Bastani could ever hope to be.
    I wasn't equating their intellectual output with Lenin, merely highlighting that they appear to exhibit traits of vanguardism as it is generally understood within Leninist theory.
    Last edited by Rudewhy; 12-10-2018 at 03:19 PM.

  14. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    North East London
    Posts
    5,827

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rudewhy View Post
    I wasn't equating their intellectual output with Lenin, merely highlighting that they appear to exhibit traits of vanguardism as it is generally understood within Leninist theory.
    I agree that narcissism is a factor but that is probably what you need if you want to attempt a career as a vlogger / youtube star and bust into the mainstream media too.

    And I think that defines them more than anything. It's the same as Tommy Robinson and all these alt right dicks with Youtube channels. They don't want to be leaders or need "followers" any more, they want subscribers and patrons. Robinson was getting a 5 figure monthly income from some US youtube channel a while back.

    I think Bastani wishes to position himself as a though leader - as the "go to" guy for radical commentary. That way he can sustain his own career and Novara, in that order.

    I don't think there is anything suspect about Novara over and above their careerism and over emphasising the radical nature of the Corbyn project. Both of which are unfortunately the zeitgeist now.

  15. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to john eden For This Useful Post:


  16. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    North East London
    Posts
    5,827

    Default

    Also I suspect one thing that is annoying about them is a lot of them come across as very studenty, still.

  17. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    8,488

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rudewhy View Post
    It's the religious, preachy, style of presenting and the weird cult of personality that they're trying to cultivate around Bastani and Sarkar that particularly bothers me. They all come across as incredibly narcissistic
    From those of my friends and acquaintances who have met Sarkar, that pretty much seems to be the consensus. I don't mind her as a public figure*, because that kind of narcissism is in a way necessary to stand up to the narcissists of the right (as in that Piers Morgan interview). But equally, I think the inability on the left to interrogate the narcissism of its key figures, in media as in politics, is a big problem in expanding its support. Same with Corbyn - his intransigence is maddening, transforming what was a strength - able not to be browbeaten and broken by the right-wing media - into a weakness.

    As my friend said - you wouldn't actually want to be in a revolution/post-capitalist place run by people that annoying on a personal level. i.e. any overturning of the current order has to have a psychological dimension as well as a political one - changing the insides of people as well as the outside conditions.

    * Also Bastani, who I'm sure said something recently that I found dodgy (annoyingly can't recall what it was), but I think he comes across well for example, here,
    Last edited by baboon2004; 12-10-2018 at 04:50 PM.

  18. The Following User Says Thank You to baboon2004 For This Useful Post:


Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •