Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: "music = speech - text"

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    385

    Default "music = speech - text"

    A while back someone asked Sean from Autechre whether he had any theories on what music is and he came out with this:

    yeah music = speech - text. at least roughly - i reckon it's a kind of super-developed version of the pitch and intonation parts of speech (the aural bit that doesn't contain textual info)

    I've always thought of music as just organised sound, but I think there's something to this given both essentially seem to be deliberate forms of aural communication, one verbal, one non-verbal (excluding lyrics).

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to version For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    CHI
    Posts
    3,762

    Default

    I'm under the impression that the earliest human music (and maybe speech? idk) was meant to imitate natural sounds - animals, wind, water

    i.e. as various styles of throat singing

    as part of shamanistic practices

    not sure if that would support or oppose Autechre dude's thesis

  4. #3
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    CHI
    Posts
    3,762

    Default

    i.e. the drone and the drum, as droid or I periodically bring up in various threads

  5. #4
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    CHI
    Posts
    3,762

    Default

    there's also the existence of things like whistling languages, talking drums, etc

    in general it seems like the aural/textual line is an indefinite (in the sense of blurry) one

    granted idk what Autechre guy's full statement was maybe he addressed that or went into more detail

  6. #5
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    CHI
    Posts
    3,762

    Default

    or maybe I'm not correctly understanding his argument

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    790

    Default

    I totally hold this view. I think it'd be more accurate to say its just an extension or another form of our language. One great example that backs this up is when we express sorrow, condolences etc western intonation will drop by a minor third. Happy surprises etc have a major third change. Also just thinking now I guess parallels can be drawn to how language generally evolves to be exclusive to particular areas or in-groups with slang etc, an evolutionary thing to keep tribes from being able to snoop on each other and such.

  8. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    790

    Default

    here's a fun Dutch study comparing Eeyore and Tigger's speech and how they consistently talk in minor or major thirds respectively. http://roa.rutgers.edu/files/846-050...REUDER-7-0.PDF

  9. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    7,701

    Default

    A few years back I was going out with a girl who was doing a Phd in philosophy and she was specifically looking at theories of art. She did her dissertation on whether art was a language or analogous to a language. I guess she kinda got bogged down in different theories of what language was and what art is and if there are any of each that you can plausibly choose that can then be shown to be similar... but seems that if you can ask that question about art in general then why not music?

  10. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    The Fear - Dublin
    Posts
    7,425

    Default

    Music is a language which expresses that which cannot be expressed through language.

  11. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    457

    Default

    music = speech - text

    reminds me of...

    chess = snooker - balls

  12. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    701

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by padraig (u.s.) View Post
    I'm under the impression that the earliest human music (and maybe speech? idk) was meant to imitate natural sounds - animals, wind, water

    i.e. as various styles of throat singing

    as part of shamanistic practices

    not sure if that would support or oppose Autechre dude's thesis
    well i've heard similar and you can say speech and music both evolved from such sounds but they eventually both evolved to a textual level. he obviously means instrumental level. so maybe more accurate to say instrumental music=music-speech so not such an insight after all/.

  13. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    701

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by woops View Post
    well i've heard similar and you can say speech and music both evolved from such sounds but they eventually both evolved to a textual level. he obviously means instrumental level. so maybe more accurate to say instrumental music=music-speech so not such an insight after all/.
    it is the time of year for bah. humbug after all

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •