Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 38

Thread: Structural conservatism in post-ardkore dance music

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    8,607

    Default Structural conservatism in post-ardkore dance music

    Stop me if this idea is as boring as the thread title

    The first dance music that I bought on vinyl and regularly mixed and raved to was drum n bass - which was structurally speaking extremely formulaic and predictable. It almost always went more or less like this:

    INTRO (64 bars, say) / FIRST BLOCK OF DRUMS N BASS / BREAKDOWN (32 bars, let's say) / SECOND BLOCK OF DRUMS N BASS / OUTRO

    Most dance music follows a formula like this, I'd guess - dubstep certainly did, UK garage similarly, and house... Even jungle, post say 93/94 was following this A / B / C / B / D formula.

    I can see the appeal of this formula, ofc, from both a DJ's perspective and the crowd's - part of the fun is knowing what to expect, perhaps having that expectation slightly subverted or played with, but ultimately knowing you'll get about 2 solid blocks of proper drums/bassline with some quieter bits inbetween to give you a rest and/or build up some tension.

    But ardkore didn't, or didn't so much - the average tune seemed to have more sections to it, more switch-ups, less resting on laurels.

    So my interest is

    1) Why WAS ardkore like this? (culture, context, technology, etc.)
    2) Why hasn't anything else since (to my knowledge) been like this?
    3) Examples of structurally less conservative dance choons from any era would be welcome

  2. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Corpsey For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    830

    Default

    it's true what you say

    there's certain hardcore tunes where it's just a sequence of different segments, that never return

    or perhaps one of them returns but there are segments that just happens once and then it's gone

    the one that always springs to mind is DJ Trax's "We Rock the Most" in terms of generosity of ideas but there's others

    whereas with D&B it got very standard in terms of the structure you mention

    i remember somebody pointing out to me that if you looked at a 12 inch you could often see by the pattern of the grooves where the - tediously extended, seldom interesting musically - intro would end

    it did mean though in the record store you could skip through a tune very quickly and establish whether it was any cop at all, just had to dip into it in three places for about 10 seconds each

    i wonder if with the hardcore bods it was something to do with not knowing whether this would be their only ever tune or something, just shoving everything they had into it

    whereas later on people would ration out ideas over many more 12 inches, put out a greater number of mono-idea tracks

    or just a more chaotic time, less career oriented, less professional, mad throw downs of ideas, neurons firing

  4. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to blissblogger For This Useful Post:


  5. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    The Fear - Dublin
    Posts
    8,381

    Default

    D'Cruze was one of the worst for the constant switch up but it's endemic across hardcore along with badly quantised breaks, out of key samples, badly played/out of time melody/basslines, extra bars and beats in weird places etc... the answer (or part of it at least) is fairly simple. A lot of people didn't know what they were doing an there was no established formula so producers just did whatever they felt like.

    Still a fair amount of unpredictability through to '95 in jungle, but the linearity really kicked in from 96 with jump up probably the last nail in the coffin.

  6. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to droid For This Useful Post:


  7. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    22,424

    Default

    Dear corpse, I like this thread a lot

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to luka For This Useful Post:


  9. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    The Fear - Dublin
    Posts
    8,381

    Default

    There's a set of criteria you could probably apply to creeping conservatism in dance music.

    Stage 1: Musical conservatism - elimination of clashing melodies based on ear, later moving on to 'musicality'.
    Stage 2. Compositional conservatism - Simpler, more formulaic & linear structures, easier for DJ's, more predictable for audiences.
    Stage 3. Aural conservatism - Shinier, better defined and produced sound, less variation between production styles and technology.

  10. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to droid For This Useful Post:


  11. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    London
    Posts
    5,079

    Default

    God bless you corpse.

    a savant and a visionary.

    you've touched on something profound. it has the potential to be as big as the dematerialisation thread.

    i'm cleaning the kitchen so don't know quite what to make of it yet.



    8 bar grime...

  12. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    London
    Posts
    5,079

    Default

    usually there's a correlation between populism and structural conformity.

    classical music doesn't repeat much does it?

    in jazz you have chin-strokey post-bop which is very loose with structure and then free jazz which eventually abandons it.


    so why is hardcore an aberration? the nuum's most populist moment was it's least structured.

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to sadmanbarty For This Useful Post:


  14. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    The Fear - Dublin
    Posts
    8,381

    Default

    Can you equate structure with predictably? Formula with marketability?

    Barty, why dont you do an audit of top 40 rave tunes 89-92 and analyse them along a comparative formulaic axis with non-chart examples?

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to droid For This Useful Post:


  16. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    22,424

    Default

    Structure probably does collapse into predictability in some sense. You might not know exactly what comes next admittedly but you know the type of thing. The drop fetishiation of 1999 was regressive in the extreme

  17. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    London
    Posts
    5,079

    Default

    the notion of ‘temporal disorientation’- a distorted perception of time- which in turn leads us to notions of the suppression of structure and narrative.
    a quote from my pitch to the psychedelic society.

  18. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    22,424

    Default

    1999 There was a moron pavlovian aspect in d&b completely absent from house& garage

  19. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    London
    Posts
    5,079

    Default

    endless succession of nows
    some cleaver bloke called simon

  20. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    London
    Posts
    5,079

    Default

    a rather endearing interpretation is that hardcore arrived at this culmination point of SO much new stimulation that arrived in the late 80's. it was just people so excited about so many different things that they just had to cram it all in.

    there must've been this frothing-at-the-mouth excitement at all this new musical stimulation arriving at once; tons of different dance music genres as well as the innovations in dancehall and rap.

  21. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to sadmanbarty For This Useful Post:


  22. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    London
    Posts
    5,079

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sadmanbarty View Post
    there are two archetypal psychadelias. the womb and orgasm; cognitive obliteration through tranquility and through over stimulation respectively.
    structural orgasm

  23. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    4,304

    Default

    the answer is quite simple actually, it's that hardcore as a defined historical period didn't exist until late 94 into 95 when that split really happened and jungle became jungle proper.

    Before that it was hardcore house, hardcore techno, jungle techno, ragga techno, breakbeat techno, deep hardcore, even have randall on one of his kiss fm shows saying something like this has been 3 hours of mature hardcore, this was early-mid 94 when it was all pretty much jungle for all intents and purposes!

    on an awol tape i have GQ says something like who is feeling the house music over terminator, a far cry from Joe Smooth!

    To use a Deleuzian term, hardcore later became reterritorialised when initially it was deterritorialised. this is not like 'deconstructed club' that is trying to grasp at deterritorialisation within already existing reterritorialisation, where deconstructed club is just another subgenre like house or techno. hardcore wasn't really like that really, hence when the splits happened so many people went so many different ways,including the very early 89-91 crowd splitting from 92.

    Yep, wicked thread corpsey, been waiting for this for ages after old gits moaning about no new new music, well fine, just get old shit, we have 100 years of recorded music to dig through, maybe there is some weird amazonian stuff from 1930 tha sounds like ur in a k-hole who knows.
    Last edited by thirdform; 29-01-2019 at 12:29 AM.

  24. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to thirdform For This Useful Post:


Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •