Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 43

Thread: The replayables

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    6,631

    Default The replayables

    And the rewatchables and rereadables.

    I'm interested in knowing what you listen to repeatedly or have been listening to repeatedly lately.

    And if this habit is dying in the internet era where you can constantly scratch the itch for new discoveries.

    What are the pros and cons of revisiting the same work of art again and again?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    1,849

    Default

    no cons.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    6,631

    Default

    The con for me would be deadening of response

    Listening to your favourite song so much you end up having it

    Is that destructive or creative?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    1,849

    Default

    a middle class concern.

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to thirdform For This Useful Post:


  6. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    1,849

    Default

    i don't even care about music anymore. i'm not even sure why i haveit on for 12 hours a day. just seems lonely without it. protestants ruined music.

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    1,849

    Default

    vinyl should have never existed tbh. that's the worst.

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to thirdform For This Useful Post:


  9. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    1,849

    Default

    what i get sick of is english people obsessed with being djs and thereby surrendering to the tyranny of a 4/4 time signature.

    who cares if there are triplets or tresillos as barty says when we can't even have turkish/egyptian aksak jungle in 9/8 and 10/8 in 2019.

  10. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to thirdform For This Useful Post:


  11. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    3,726

    Default

    I love replaying things I can't quite get my head around. tends to be things a little more experimental. the albums where when they are done, nothing has really stuck in your brain, you haven't cracked it and put it in a box. it's not defined and slotted in, not yet connected to a mood ("when I'm in the mood to listen to X, I know I can scratch that itch by listening to Y.") records that are still in that nebulous limbo, they can be played a couple of times in a row and it doesn't feel like you're doing so, it's just another hours of sounds to explore. oddly, there is sometimes a point where things just click and you are able to label it in your mind. other times, it remains at most just a vague connection to a genre, still mysterious.

    these are the types of records I enjoy for the longest periods of time, years.

  12. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Leo For This Useful Post:


  13. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    1,849

    Default

    yeah i don't think i'll ever get sick of pharoah at his best or coltrane simply because they transcended what we call genre without being a hyper-fascist capitalist omnivore

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to thirdform For This Useful Post:


  15. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    1,849

    Default

    the thing is im not supposed to be in music, i was the bloke who was picked on in school, im always moody, a real dork, i prefer keeping to myself most times. that's why its like i try not to think about these things cos then im like why am i even thinking about this in the first place. it's like enforced pleasure ain't it, a pleasure prison as that Achim Szepanski lad said in Simon's book.

  16. The Following User Says Thank You to thirdform For This Useful Post:


  17. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    1,849

    Default

    did barry feed luke some datura or something. not even joking missing them both in a romantic way.

  18. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    1,849

    Default

    someone should drip feed me good music but. ergh im so lazy.

  19. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    3,726

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by thirdform View Post
    yeah i don't think i'll ever get sick of pharoah at his best or coltrane simply because they transcended what we call genre without being a hyper-fascist capitalist omnivore
    I was actually thinking this applied more to Alice Coltrane than John. He may have made the greater contribution to music but is more easily defined, Alice is in my mind more "other".

  20. The Following User Says Thank You to Leo For This Useful Post:


  21. #14
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    407

    Default

    I do this a lot, listening to the same album or mix over and over again. It helps me to maintain concentration, blocking out other stimuli, whilst setting a certain mood during work. The recently published compilation on environmental music and new age (curated by Visible Cloaks) is one that obviously performs such task well. At first, this might seem at odds with the idea of the tread (music so good it can bear repetition). But it wouldn’t work with any album I didn’t rate in the first place.

    Recently I started doing the same with certain labels I have most releases of. Play all of them in shuffle all day long. Stuff from the defunct 1080p, for example. Or Music from Memory.

  22. The Following User Says Thank You to m99188868 For This Useful Post:

    Leo

  23. #15
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    3,726

    Default

    replayability (new word!) is, for me, far less likely to happen with any forms of pop or rock, 3:00 minute tracks with traditional song structure. they may be great pop songs, but they are too defined. needs to be odd, flowing "other" music.

  24. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Leo For This Useful Post:


Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •