Page 1 of 16 12311 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 239

Thread: DJing is a right wing abomination

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    2,966

    Default DJing is a right wing abomination

    discuss.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    16,534

    Default

    Bit try-hard, m8.
    Doin' the Lambeth Warp New: DISSENSUS - THE NOVEL - PM me your email address and I'll add you

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    19,817

    Default

    Please don't subject thirdform to your compulsive social levelling. Just leave him be.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    North East London
    Posts
    5,911

    Default

    It can be very individualistic. The centring of the DJ obscures the wider social relations that support it.

    It is better when the DJs are also the dancers, the people who designed the flyers, the people who made the tunes, the people who set up and the people who cleaned up.

  5. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to john eden For This Useful Post:


  6. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    2,966

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by john eden View Post
    It can be very individualistic. The centring of the DJ obscures the wider social relations that support it.

    It is better when the DJs are also the dancers, the people who designed the flyers, the people who made the tunes, the people who set up and the people who cleaned up.

    Yes. we are talking about a particular ethos here, a particular standardisation of music, a particular cultural value set with specific cultural codes. not beat mixing two or more tunes. top post John, as always.

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    2,966

    Default

    blissblogger. this is your time to shine. get in the ring. prove to the world proletariat that you will be the next luxemburg. the few paragraphs you will write on this thread will be quoted by generations to come verbatim. the 20 minutes you will dedicate to this will far eclipse the time it took you to right energy flash. the fruits of your labour will be encrusted in blood and fire. this is the ritual to end all rituals. you will define a new paradigm of magick (reinforced magick.) this is it. you're going to be our martyr for the revolution. go on lad.
    Last edited by thirdform; 16-03-2019 at 10:16 AM.

  8. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to thirdform For This Useful Post:


  9. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    2,966

    Default

    Zawahiri. it is 2033 and all the idols have been smashed once again. the whole world has surrendered to islam, including russia. The miniscule remnants of the enemy shivver and tremble beneath your feet, only to be tossed away by a powerful gust of wind from the almighty. you stand atop a podium in mecca. world satellite tv has zoned in on your face. you are going to proclaim the first pure islamic state in the history of humankind. there will be no dhimis. there is only one obstacle: America has not surrendered. You can nuke America but it will be playing your hand too early. you are going to bury America. you are going to turn the world upside down with your silver-forked tongue. this is your moment. you have 5 minutes. let's 'av it geezer.
    Last edited by thirdform; 16-03-2019 at 10:32 AM.

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to thirdform For This Useful Post:


  11. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    427

    Default

    There is certainly something almost-fascist about wanting to make people move to the rhytm you set. But doesn't that hold, with differing modalities, for all the arts? Is the writer, who forces you to sit down and stop everything else you were doing in order to read him or her, less of a fascist? It seems to me what you hint at is the basic constellation for most if not all arts: somebody performs and as a spectator, you decide to either accept or not what he or she does as a premisse for what you're about to experience.

    Unless I am mistaken Umberto Eco's idea of an 'opera aperta' tried to subvert this idea, but only to a certain degree.

  12. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    427

    Default



    self-reflexivity as a governance means ^ ^

  13. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    2,966

    Default

    djs killed the hardcore continuum.

  14. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    19,817

    Default

    There's different approaches. There's an exchange on the ragga jungle thread here
    http://www.dissensus.com/showthread....t=Ragga+jungle

    between two DJs you're probably too young to remember
    Luca, of Rossi B & Luca, who used to do a populist show on Rinse, a kind of Heartless crew selection of all the big tunes from different genres, garage, r&b, dancehall, whatever, which was a very popular format at the turn of the century, perhaps less so now, and a tasteful techno dj called Ben UFO.

    Luca posted a jungle mix and Ben UFO responded by saying

    "Anyone for an anthem bash bash bash bash bash bash"

  15. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    19,817

    Default

    I think where Simon might resist this notion of DJ as Mussolini is through his understanding of the feedback loop operational between dj and crowd. There's a spectrum of course, that goes from Rossi B & Luca (give em what they want) to Ben UFO (give them what's good for them)

  16. The Following User Says Thank You to luka For This Useful Post:


  17. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    19,817

    Default

    Ben UFOs are certainly paternalistic, like the BBC in the 1950s, without necessarily being Mussolinis. It's related to, without being identical with, the dj as pedagogue model, which you see in Rodigan, in Gilles Peterson etc etc

  18. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to luka For This Useful Post:


  19. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    19,817

    Default

    As a kind of root impulse lying behind all this is the tyrannical desire to monopolise the aux cord which, i suspect, is present to some degree in all of us here, at least on the music forum.

  20. The Following User Says Thank You to luka For This Useful Post:


  21. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    19,817

    Default

    One interesting thing to think about is the role of the crowd and the mass, shared experience, whether that can easily be characterised as either left or right. By playing the same music to everyone we standardise the input channel. By seeing the reactions of other people to identical inputs we get a very profound sense of them, both in their commonality and their difference. On the other hand control societies rely on standardising inputs, Burroughs talks about this in relation to the Mayan Calender.

  22. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to luka For This Useful Post:


Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •