Page 207 of 210 FirstFirst ... 107157197205206207208209 ... LastLast
Results 3,091 to 3,105 of 3136

Thread: what are you reading now?

  1. #3091
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    6,607

    Default

    He reads Pynchon for breakfast, I reckon he'll be lured in more by difficulty

  2. #3092
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    17,885

    Default

    Shush! He's reading. You can talk to him again once he's finished

  3. #3093
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    The Fear - Dublin
    Posts
    7,648

    Default

    I make it a point to pass Frúdmanís Chemist shop and 7 Eccles st on my commute. Bloomsday everyday, except with more phlegm.

  4. #3094
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    17,885

    Default

    It won't. Just read it. Get on with it. Stop making excuses. Corpsey will help you. It's an old maids book club. I'll make a Victoria sponge.

  5. #3095
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    East Loondon
    Posts
    1,600

    Default

    I am mostly reading boring psychotherapy papers at the moment, though as part of this I've deviated into reading Nick Totton's Embodied Relating which is mind blowingly good if a bit of a specialist audience thing, like most counselling books. A big shame because it's really amazing - a super deep treatise on embodiment that incorporates all the latest research. Amazing life affirming stuff - for me anyway. Shame it's in the counselling ghetto. And I've nearly finished Ola Raknes' Wilhelm Reich & Orgonomy, a Pelican paperback by Reich's longest standing European student. It is pretty great though perhaps a bit too much orgone for one sitting. I heard a quote yesterday which ran something like "only tell people one unbelievable thing at a time" and that'd be germane here. It's often like that when one strays into the further reaches of Reich's work.

  6. #3096
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    17,885

    Default

    What does embodied relating mean?

  7. #3097
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    East Loondon
    Posts
    1,600

    Default

    it's basically a take on relational counselling & psychotherapy - i.e. being very aware of the relationship as an area where therapeutic content might play out - but which factors in the body as part of this.

    He has some great arguments that what's normally presented as simply transference or whatever is actually felt as embodied at first and then disowned in "normal" heady/talk therapy counselling.

  8. #3098
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    17,885

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by version View Post
    If you're on about the first chapter, I've read it.
    All of it? It's about 50 pages. How is that possible?

  9. #3099
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    East Loondon
    Posts
    1,600

    Default

    The traditional Reichian model would be an expert therapist does something to a passive client which obviously has all sort of problems, much as I've benefitted from that type of work. Working like this excludes the relational dynamics (all the rage, sadness, dependency, guilt etc that both of you might feel working together). The model he's proposing is more of a two way street.

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to DannyL For This Useful Post:


  11. #3100
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    17,885

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by version View Post
    Oh wait, I thought the full chapter was 23 pages. My copy has odd formatting and makes it look like the end of the chapter.
    Give us the full report of how you got on please

  12. #3101
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    17,885

    Default

    Yes sorry forgot you are an 'ideas' reader as opposed to a language reader

  13. #3102
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    17,885

    Default

    There are plenty of ideas there but you would have to look them up as secondary reading as with pynchon. That's fun actually im not deriding it

  14. #3103
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    17,885

    Default

    Yeah I get it now. Why not read them together?

  15. #3104
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    17,885

    Default

    If someone points out and explains an idea to me I csn go oh right, that's clever isn't it, but left to my own devices I'll do my best to ignore them

  16. #3105
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    6,607

    Default

    As far as I'm aware, all you'll really get from the Odyssey is that Stephen is Telemachus, living in a "palace" occupied by "usurpers". (Haines represents England, the great usurper of Irish rule.) His unforeseen mission in Ulysses will be to find a surrogate father (Bloom), as Telemachus's mission will be to find Odysseus and bring him home to destroy the suitors to his wife. (Bloom's wife is adulterous.)

    There are some references to Homer in that chapter (the winedark sea).

    There are differing views on how important the Homeric parallel is to Ulysses. Nabokov said that Joyce told him he wished the Homeric index had never been released, because it wasn't really all that important. OTOH, of course, it is CALLED "Ulysses"!

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •