Books you've read recently and would unreservedly recommend

D

droid

Guest
IdleRich said:
One book in particular I remember thinking that about is Cities of the Red Night by WS Burroughs. Unlike most of his other books it has a (kind of) coherent story at first which gets you desperate to know how it ends and then it suddenly goes all Naked Lunch. Which is still cool and everything but to me it would have been better if he could have finished off the narrative. I guess a lot of people would disagree with me on that though.

Like me! :D I love that book...
 

IdleRich

IdleRich
"I love that book..."
Well me too, I just love all the stuff at the start more than the end. Are you honestly saying that you wouldn't have preferred it if he could have somehow tied together all that stuff about the missing boy, the utopian country in South America, time travel and whatever else (it's ten years since I read it)?
 

jenks

thread death
michael said:
The only book I've read recently that I thought was really good was Jonathan Safran Foer's 'Everything is Illuminated'. Mainly, I was impressed with how exceptionally entertaining it was, while being at least slightly unusual form-wise.

The chapters written from the perspective of a young Ukrainian guy with a terrible grasp of English resonated nicely with me, having just started English teaching here.

It's a bit, um, "magic realism", or whatever. Parts reminded me of someone like Rushdie, which I can't see as a good thing.

i really like Foer's stuff. I found Illuminated surprisingly moving - i thought i was going to get a tricksy kind of knowingness and found myself drawn into a very subtle novel - the unpeeling of the story - yeah we know the grandad is going to have more to do with the story etc but still it works and surprises

also the folksy story allows for lots of, at first, amusing parodies of jewish folk stories before it too reveals a dark and bitter secret. and it seems to me as if this method is an attempt to approach the truth side-on, as if facing it full on reveals nothing - the banality of being told against the shock of being shown when least expecting it. as if the horror is too great to be approached conventionally, instead we get a skirting around, a slow circling trapping us with light humour and bad puns and then before we can escape...the horror. as if the only method left to make meaning is via other genres, other forms

i also really like his second novel about the effects of the twin towers on a prodigously gifted boy - it could come across, again, as a bit tricksy if it wasn't for the incredibly engaging voice of the boy and Foer's ability to hang three or four different narrative threads convincingly

he seems like an author who doesn't shy away from big issues - genocide, in particular;but it feels to me as if his project is to remind us of the human element in what have become historical events
 

Rambler

Awanturnik
Finally got round to reading Jon McGregor's If nobody speaks of remarkable things; definitely one for this thread. The language is some of the most beautiful I've read in a novel since Woolf. It's overtly poetic, but never ostentatious about it. The story's a bit trite, but actually not as trite as some might have you believe. And McGregor is a rare author with a superb ear - his descriptions of sounds are very special indeed and worth the read alone.

His second's out this August; I'll bet that's worth a read too.
 

Slothrop

Tight but Polite
IdleRich said:
Well me too, I just love all the stuff at the start more than the end. Are you honestly saying that you wouldn't have preferred it if he could have somehow tied together all that stuff about the missing boy, the utopian country in South America, time travel and whatever else (it's ten years since I read it)?
I haven't read it for a while either, but part of what I liked about it was the sense that all the storylines were sort of linked and sort of not. The same is true of Naked Lunch, IMO - it feels like a coherent story seen through a cracked lense.
 

IdleRich

IdleRich
"The same is true of Naked Lunch, IMO - it feels like a coherent story seen through a cracked lense."
I think that's pretty much true, it's just that in Naked Lunch either the story is less coherent or the lens is more cracked. Either way Cities of the Red Night was tantalisingly close to letting you see the whole picture and it left me wishing that I could.
 
D

droid

Guest
Slothrop said:
I haven't read it for a while either, but part of what I liked about it was the sense that all the storylines were sort of linked and sort of not. The same is true of Naked Lunch, IMO - it feels like a coherent story seen through a cracked lense.

Thats kinda how I feel as well... its more about the imagery and demented atmosphere... I think i described it on some other thread as some kind of fractured hyper-manga narrative ala Neon Genisis Evangelion or Akira (with added seediness) - though thinking about it, a closer analog might be Moebius's 'The Long Tomorrow', which has elements of politics/sex/sci-fi, but all wrapped up in a kind of pointless and chaotic intensity... loads of stuff happens, but it never 'climaxes' (or it climaxes in a way you didnt notice/expect).

There were loads of other ideas in this book that struck me as being obscenely ahead of their time... I really have to go and read it again. :eek:
 

IdleRich

IdleRich
Did you ever read that book called Tlooth? Reminded me of Burroughs in certain scenes but with a lot of weird word games and stuff. Very strange. I read somewhere on the internet that it was all supposed to come together and mean something in the end but if it did I'm afraid that it went over my head. I think it was by somebody called Matthews or something.
 

JimO'Brien

Active member
IdleRich said:
Did you ever read that book called Tlooth? Reminded me of Burroughs in certain scenes but with a lot of weird word games and stuff. Very strange. I read somewhere on the internet that it was all supposed to come together and mean something in the end but if it did I'm afraid that it went over my head. I think it was by somebody called Matthews or something.

It was by Harry Mathews - I haven't read tlooth but have read many others. He is a member of Oulipo and a lot of his stuff is written under self imposed constraints. All of his books that I have read are worth reading and I would particularly recommend My Life in CIA his recent memoir/novel.
 
Last edited:

JimO'Brien

Active member
The Oulipo - in full, the Ouvroir de Littérature Potentielle, or Workshop for Potential Literature - was founded in France in 1960 by the French author Raymond Queneau and the mathematical historian François Le Lionnais. Made up of mathematicians as well as writers, the group assigned itself the task of exploring how mathematical structures might be used in literary creation. The idea of mathematical structure was soon broadened to include all highly restrictive methods, like the palindrome and the sestina, that are strict enough to play a decisive role in determining what their users write. The most notorious example of this approach is Georges Perec's novel, A Void, written without a single appearance of the letter e.

For many years the Oulipo - which is, by the way, still going strong - was considered in France to be a rather daffy enterprise capable of producing work that was often hilarious but decidedly eccentric. The appearance of Georges Perec's Life A User's Manual and Italo Calvino's If On A Winter's Night A Traveler, both exploiting Oulipian structures, did much to modify the general view, as did no doubt the distinction of the Oulipo's membership. In addition to Queneau, Perec, and Calvino, it has included Marcel Duchamp, Harry Mathews, and Jacques Roubaud, together with many notable writers and scholars little known outside France and a number of mathematicians (such as Claude Berge) who are internationally famous within their profession. By the 1980s, the Oulipo had become renowned, respected and - to the consternation of its members - almost reputable.

I found this on a website for the Oulipo Compendium. If you do a search you will easily find lots of information on the Organisation.
 

IdleRich

IdleRich
Thank you for that. I realised that I could look it up but I thought you might be able to give a simple overview seeing as you raised it and it is obviously something that you know more about than me. Another question coming up if you don't mind, I've read If On a Winter's Night a Traveller (and quite enjoyed it), what were the restrictions in place that resulted in him coming up with that?
I heard that one of the reviewers of A Void read it without realising the premise, didn't notice that there were no "e"s and reviewed it as a normal book. I wonder if that is true.
 

Grievous Angel

Beast of Burden
Reading this thread is like going through my wife's reading list! (That's a compliment BTW!)

I find it very hard to sit down and read a novel these days - it's almost physically painful for me. The last one I read that really got me was Absolute Friends by John LeCarre, which gently, floatingly drifts up to this towering, corruscating ziggurat of rage and disgust. If you haven't read that it's probably worth a go.
 

Rambler

Awanturnik
2stepfan said:
Reading this thread is like going through my wife's reading list! (That's a compliment BTW!)

I find it very hard to sit down and read a novel these days - it's almost physically painful for me. The last one I read that really got me was Absolute Friends by John LeCarre, which gently, floatingly drifts up to this towering, corruscating ziggurat of rage and disgust. If you haven't read that it's probably worth a go.

Seconded!
 

bruno

est malade
bassnation said:
ashamed to say this but i've never read any dostoevski - what is great about his writing? any recommendations on where to start?
i don't know how to put it (it has been said a thousand times before) but his insight into the human condition is truly lucid. what he does is create very well-defined characters and sets them off on a collision course. what you see is a little sequence of this. there is a sense that they are playing out predefined parts, like in a greek tragedy, all the more poignant in that you can sense the blood running through them and there are no gods pulling the strings. this empathy and feeling that there is no beginning and end to this mess is the 'truth' that emerges so vividly, i think. i like the short stories a lot (there is a modern library volume which is very nice and includes notes from the underground), but if you've plenty of spare time do the novels. start with the idiot, have a bite to eat, and move on to the brothers karamazov. finishing these you will feel that can die in peace!
 

Jim Daze

Well-known member
Sheperton Babylon, authors name escapes me just now. Parts of it are hilarious, the author deconstructs the Ealing canon and reveals what talentless and overated ego maniacs many of our best actors are/were. The final chapters on the 8mm porn kings of Soho are fascinating and escpecially some of his language especially when he refers to Sid james as a walnut, not doing it justice but ig you want to read a good film book look no further.
 

JimO'Brien

Active member
IdleRich said:
Thank you for that. I realised that I could look it up but I thought you might be able to give a simple overview seeing as you raised it and it is obviously something that you know more about than me. Another question coming up if you don't mind, I've read If On a Winter's Night a Traveller (and quite enjoyed it), what were the restrictions in place that resulted in him coming up with that?
I heard that one of the reviewers of A Void read it without realising the premise, didn't notice that there were no "e"s and reviewed it as a normal book. I wonder if that is true.


Please excuse the delay in responding. Calvino wrote a short piece called How I wrote one of my Books about the restraints to If on a Winter's Night a traveller. The piece only dicusses the narrative half of he book and not the indiviual first chapters of the various novels within the book ( which I believe were also subject to constraints). The explanation was issued as part of the Oulipo Library and is 20 pages long so is fairly complex itself - but essentially it a scheme based on A J Greimas' structural analysis of narrative and is based on squares. The explanation is availoable in English in Atlas Press's Oulipo Laboratory - which you can order from them if you were interested. You may be better off just enjoying the book without realising the premise.
 

IdleRich

IdleRich
No problem. Thanks for the reply and I couldn't have hoped for a better answer to my question than to be pointed in the direction of an exact description. Now I've asked for it I really ought to check it out I guess although your comment about "just enjoying the book" sounds quite attractive.
 

D7_bohs

Well-known member
Just finished Bernhard's Extinction - mordantly funny and with a tone, instantly recognisible as Bernhard, which, while easy to parody,is impossible to reproduce. Irish people here might like to insert the word 'Ireland' where 'Austria' occurs in the following passage;

'The whole of Austria has been turned into an unscrupulous commercial concern in which everything is bargained for and everyone is defrauded. You think you're visiting a beautiful country, but in reality you're visiting a monstrous business enterprise. You think you're entering a land of culture, but you're dismayed by the primitive mentality you encounter everywhere.... in no other country have they taken the brainless slogans of progress as seriously as in Austria, I said, and thereby ruined everything'
 

jenks

thread death
I am 25 pages away from finishing David Peace's 1980 - I know it's part of a quartet and it's the third segment but it was the only one in the library

This is just gripping - very Ellroy with its clipped prose style, lots of repetition and vivid visual style. It also has a strong darkly poetic thread to it. I cannot recommend it highly enough and makes me feel pleased that there is more of him to read.

The basic premise is that a copper has been asked to review the progress of the Yorkshire Ripper case but this soon spins out into a grim investigation into the heart of darkness.

I can remember 1980 very vividly - i used to deliver newspapers and can still visualise the headlines around that time - ripper sensationalism, lennon murdered, nuclear fears - and this book really catches the atmosphere of those times.

It certainly does nothing for Yorkshire which is presented as the very centre of corruption and violent thuggery and the way he describes the repeated journeys over the moors is doom-laden and portentious.

Compulsively readable
 
Top