Page 12 of 13 FirstFirst ... 210111213 LastLast
Results 166 to 180 of 190

Thread: Environmental Collapse: when and how bad?

  1. #166
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    On the bus
    Posts
    1,122

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by droid View Post
    50/50. It depends on the choices we make.
    Would literally take an instant global change of habits which just isn't goin fro happen
    Took a rest stop that wasn't on the schedule

  2. #167
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    17,037

    Default

    Has anyone else been following this story? Turns out scientists working for Exxon knew about the connection between atmospheric CO2 and the global climate more than 35 years ago, and even predicted pretty much bang on the money that average CO2 levels would reach 415 ppm by 2019, which they recently have.

    exxon_CO2.jpg

    But of course they suppressed it, and became a leading player in the AGW-denial industry. It's depressing to think how much progress could have been made in that time if successful legal challenges had been made against what, even then, was unambiguously a campaign of disinformation which has endangered the entire planet to protect corporate profits.

    It's reminiscent of the way tobacco companies deliberately suppressed research on the health hazards and addiction potential of smoking, which resulted in some huge lawsuits being made against them and all sorts of laws in many countries requiring these companies to say essentially "this product might kill you" on the packaging, as well as restrictions on where you can smoke and so on. The trouble with the fossil fuel companies is that their potential victims are literally *everyone*, rather than an identifiable group of people suffering particular diseases. That said, there could be some hope in this approach, as some people are clearly much more vulnerable to the effects of climate change than others:

    https://edition.cnn.com/2019/05/13/a...ntl/index.html

    A group of indigenous people from low-lying islands off the coast of Australia on Monday lodged an unprecedented complaint against the country's government, accusing it of insufficient action on climate change.

    The eight Torres Strait Islanders filed the complaint with the United Nations Human Rights Committee, claiming that rising sea levels were having a devastating effect on their communities.
    Around 4,500 people live on the Torres Strait Islands, a group of more than 270 islands lying between the north coast of Australia and Papua New Guinea. The complainants say their homes, burial grounds and cultural sites could disappear underwater in their lifetimes.
    Australia's failure to adequately address the problem was a breach of its human rights obligations to the islanders, they allege.
    Australia is a good place to start actually, not just because of their very visible and very disadvantaged indigenous communities but also because they're a particularly bad offender for GHG emissions - eighth-worst in the world a few years ago (in per-person terms).
    Last edited by Mr. Tea; 16-05-2019 at 07:11 PM.
    Doin' the Lambeth Warp New: DISSENSUS - THE NOVEL - PM me your email address and I'll add you

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to Mr. Tea For This Useful Post:


  4. #168
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    The Fear - Dublin
    Posts
    8,340

    Default

    Flawed Reasoning: The authors' argument claims a correlation between cloud cover/relative humidity and global temperature proves that the former caused the latter without investigating whether they have the relationship backwards.

    Inadequate support: The source of their claimed global cloud dataset is not given, and no research on their proposed mechanism for climate change is cited.

    Fails to provide correct physical explanation: The manuscript incorrectly claims that the rise of atmospheric carbon dioxide is caused by release from ocean waters. It also provides no explanation for the claim that an increase in relative humidity causes global cooling.

    This document is not a proper scientific paper and would not pass peer review in an academic journal. The crucial data sources (e.g. of the dataset claimed to be low cloud cover) are not provided, and the figure purporting to show changes in cloud cover is at odds with peer-reviewed papers like Eastman et al1. That published scientific paper does not show the decline in low cloud cover claimed in this document.

    https://climatefeedback.org/claimrev...lobal-warming/

  5. #169
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Kingston
    Posts
    1,445

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by droid View Post
    Flawed Reasoning: The authors' argument claims a correlation between cloud cover/relative humidity and global temperature proves that the former caused the latter without investigating whether they have the relationship backwards.

    Inadequate support: The source of their claimed global cloud dataset is not given, and no research on their proposed mechanism for climate change is cited.

    Fails to provide correct physical explanation: The manuscript incorrectly claims that the rise of atmospheric carbon dioxide is caused by release from ocean waters. It also provides no explanation for the claim that an increase in relative humidity causes global cooling.

    This document is not a proper scientific paper and would not pass peer review in an academic journal. The crucial data sources (e.g. of the dataset claimed to be low cloud cover) are not provided, and the figure purporting to show changes in cloud cover is at odds with peer-reviewed papers like Eastman et al1. That published scientific paper does not show the decline in low cloud cover claimed in this document.

    https://climatefeedback.org/claimrev...lobal-warming/
    Yes it's nonsense, when you go down to the references... tumbleweed and crickets!

  6. #170
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Berlin
    Posts
    1,294

    Default

    watching sparrows take dust baths, flapping their little wings in the sand, cheep cheep cheep cheep. might buy an ice cream later.

  7. #171
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    17,037

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by yyaldrin View Post
    watching sparrows take dust baths, flapping their little wings in the sand, cheep cheep cheep cheep. might buy an ice cream later.
    Doin' the Lambeth Warp New: DISSENSUS - THE NOVEL - PM me your email address and I'll add you

  8. #172
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    The Fear - Dublin
    Posts
    8,340

    Default

    Arctic melting has the potential to add a trillion tons of C02's worth of heat to the atmosphere, pushing climate predictions 25 years forward.

    https://scripps.ucsd.edu/news/resear...rming-25-years

    Worst case scenarios of 2 degrees by 2025 looking more plausible. Times running out people. Whatever you're doing or want to do, this is more important.
    Last edited by droid; 29-07-2019 at 04:58 PM.

  9. #173
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    8,852

    Default

    holy fuck. that is quite mad.

  10. #174
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    On the bus
    Posts
    1,122

    Default

    What are we supposed to do?
    Took a rest stop that wasn't on the schedule

  11. #175
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    The Fear - Dublin
    Posts
    8,340

    Default

    1. Accept that changes are coming, treat others with love and compassion and try to build communities in your neighbourhood, workplace etc.
    2. Talk to people. Tell everyone you know what's going on and how dire the situation is and urge them to take action.
    3. Join an environmental group, lobby politicians, take part in or support direct action groups.
    -
    -
    -
    -
    -
    -
    -
    -
    -

    4. Make changes in your own lifestyle to reduce your burden on the planet.

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to droid For This Useful Post:


  13. #176
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    The Fear - Dublin
    Posts
    8,340

    Default

    It's tempting to narrativise the situation and whilst the worst outcomes are terrifying and disturbing plausible, the universe does not punish bad behaviour.

    Nothing is written in stone. Anything is possible. We were barely missed by a 30xHiroshima asteroid last week - that could have hit the whitehouse!

  14. #177
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    لندورا
    Posts
    3,190

  15. #178
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    On the bus
    Posts
    1,122

    Default

    I don't want to get into a debate or anything but are you open to the idea (as some theorise) that part of this situ being to do with a natural climate oscillation that happens over millenia and we just happen to be unlucky enough to be there toward the extreme of the chart or do you think it's mostly down to man?

    Obviously we are playing a massive role.
    Took a rest stop that wasn't on the schedule

  16. #179
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    The Fear - Dublin
    Posts
    8,340

    Default

    No, its total garbage. We're actually heading into a grand solar minimum which my keep us a few fractions of a degree lower than we should be over the coming decades. If this was a natural cycle, the planet would be getting colder.

  17. The Following User Says Thank You to droid For This Useful Post:


  18. #180
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Berlin
    Posts
    1,294

    Default

    oh man the way you guys talk i feel like i have to start prepping

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •