Page 52 of 53 FirstFirst ... 24250515253 LastLast
Results 766 to 780 of 786

Thread: films you've seen recently and would NOT recommend

  1. #766
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    8,307

    Default

    At the weekend we watched Gaspar Noe's Climax and Von Triers' The House that Jack Built. Climax was terrible, another disappointment from a director who always flatters to deceive. I always start his films with high hopes, always finish them depressed and moaning. This one was particularly boring (which is a crime I can't forgive) and hamstrung from the start by the decision to use non actors (dancers) and a lot of improvised dialogue which they clearly weren't capable of doing well. The film is about a kind of descent into chaos but really it just has two modes - slow and super fast - and there is no progression, I guess the director realised this and tried to hide it with flashy tricks, most notably putting the credits in the middle so you don't notice there is no middle. One day he will make a great film but it's a while away yet.
    THTJB wasn't great but comparatively it was much better. Again a bit dull enlivened with some moments of humour and some grubby violence (if you like that kind of thing) - the ending was from out of leftfield (although it did use the same framing kind of gimmick as Nymphomaniac) and was probably the best bit. More ok than terrible, especially after Climax.

  2. #767
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    1,339

    Default

    I love Noe's stuff from a sonic and visual - even if a lot of it does feel lifted from Eyes Wide Shut - perspective, but he can't write a story, script, characters for shit.

    When your finest hour is a credits sequence then you should probably be making music videos, ads and whatnot, not feature-films.

  3. #768
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    8,307

    Default

    Yeah. But also the films sound promising on paper but never deliver.

  4. #769
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    1,339

    Default

    I often find that there's moments I enjoy, but they're surrounded by an hour or more of filler. The first hour or so of Enter the Void was decent, but then there's like another hour and twenty minutes of essentially the same all over again. You'd get some pretty, swirling shot of a softly glowing room, the camera would wander around then it would zoom into a light bulb or something and it would happen over and over and over. It just became tedious.

  5. #770
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    8,307

    Default

    In a nutshell that's it.
    I met Gaspar Noe at a party in Paris just after Enter the Void had come out. I didn't venture my opinion. To be honest he was much more interested in the impossibly beautiful girl that he turned up with. It did make me laugh shortly after when that I saw a statement from him in the news when he said that he liked Paz de La Huerta for his films cos she was hot and didn't mind getting naked - next day this girl put a picture of herself on facebook completely naked. I don't think she got in any of his films though.

  6. #771
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Berlin
    Posts
    1,150

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by version View Post
    I love Noe's stuff from a sonic and visual - even if a lot of it does feel lifted from Eyes Wide Shut - perspective, but he can't write a story, script, characters for shit.

    When your finest hour is a credits sequence then you should probably be making music videos, ads and whatnot, not feature-films.
    i liked his movies for the same reasons: it's visual qualities. also, i don't care so much for plot or narrative so have never been bothered by a lack of story. in fact, if climax would be a 90 minute long dance choreography i think i would have liked it better. what started to bother me more and more is the grim misogynistic violence in his movies. goes for lars von trier as well. like the world is shit enough already don't wanna see the horrors magnified and zoomed in on a screen.

  7. #772
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    1,339

    Default

    Apparently that new one of von Trier's, The House that Jack Built, is deeply unpleasant.

  8. #773
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    8,307

    Default

    I watched it on the same day as Climax in fact. I was really getting ready to be horrified but it wasn't as bad as I was expecting. I mean, it wasn't a walk in the park and a couple of scenes were truly uncomfortable but overall it was more.... boring I guess. I think I would have probably liked it less if I hadn't just seen Climax, compared to that it was good. The final scenes were even quite interesting in their own right.
    I should say that there are several different versions I think, maybe I downloaded one with the worst bits cut out. If so it's the version I'm stuck with cos I'm not watching it again.
    Melancholia was on telly here the other day and I watched it again cos I remember quite enjoying it the first time but this time round I found it pretty boring. That set me thinking about what films of his I like, I think really the only one is Nymphomaniac. Others have good bits but I'm not sure there are many films that are actually GOOD films from start to end.
    You're not wrong to compare Noe and Von Trier in my opinion - not even so much cos they're both (probably) misogynistic arseholes but rather because, in my mind, they are both guys with interesting ideas who set out to make films that are truly art and which challenge the Hollywood system and which are just original and distinctive works but, sadly, neither of them are actually much good at making films which leads to this situation where I (and probably loads of others) will always check out their new films with high expectations and leave disappointed.

  9. #774
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Posts
    85

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Leo View Post
    Sean's pretty unbearable but was good in "Milk" and "Mystic River".
    I like Penn. At Close Range I've gone back to watch a few time and saw/read The Falcon and The Snowman recently which is another decent film. I rate Noe as well for Irreversible and Enter the Void, but the only other one I've seen is I Stand Alone which was just a bad film. The House That Jack Built was just too long, I guess that was part of the point of it, to test the audience, but I almost switched it off.

    Saw Days of Eclipse by Sokurov recently, based on a Strugatsky novel. Not averse to slow cinema at all but nothing really happened in this especially in the second half, boring. Apparently it was one of his early films and so he found his footing later as it's not a masterpiece.

  10. #775
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Posts
    85

    Default

    White Dog 1982.
    Fuller is usually gritty and wise cracking in a way that appeals to Tarantino fanboys. This is easily the worst film of his I've seen. Bordering on exploitation with awful B movie aesthetics and telling to the racial values of the time.

    Butterfly 1982.
    It has Pia Zadora. More famous for burning down Pickford Mansion than her shortlived film and pop career. Orson Welles as a drunk judge on a perverted case. Not even Morricone's average score could save this one.

    Freeway. 1988.
    Another overated B movie thriller about a killer priest shooting people on a 'freeway' with another model turned Darlanne Fluegel ("To Live and Die in L.A."). It's directed by Francis Delia and synth scored by Joe Delia who scored a lot of films for Abel Ferrara, another hack.

    La Luna 1979.
    Italian art house schlock from Bertolucci with a very questionable plot where a mother devises a ploy to get her son of heroin. Overlong.

  11. #776
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    8,307

    Default

    Seems like you've had a run of bad luck there cos some of those sound like winners from the description.
    Tell me about Days of Eclipse? Sokulov is slow I guess, I've not seen many of his, remember liking his version of Faust well enough.

  12. #777
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    8,307

    Default

    Just came back from the cinema after watching The Beach Bum. Thinking about it, it was probably slightly smarter than it originally appeared but even so it wasn't much fun to watch for the most part and really do you need an hour and a half to say what we all know - that hippies are wankers?

  13. #778
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Posts
    85

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by IdleRich View Post
    Seems like you've had a run of bad luck there cos some of those sound like winners from the description.
    Tell me about Days of Eclipse? Sokulov is slow I guess, I've not seen many of his, remember liking his version of Faust well enough.

    Days of Eclipse I probably should watch something else by the same director before writing about. It was just an empty film

    A lot of those Russian art house directors are slow, sometimes it works. This started well, almost a paean to rural soviet Turkmenistan to begin with shots of ethnic traditions it felt as though it was going to turn more lively, instead it peters out; not in a weird or bleak way I think more a criticism of censorship way.

    I've seen some great films recently too. The french prison film Le Trou comes to mind.

  14. #779
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    8,307

    Default

    Didn't Sokurov do Russian Ark? It's the kinda archetypal slow film. I remember a period where I watched some of his films and I sort of looked through his back catalogue to see which others I should check and they all looked really really boring so I never did. I know that's me being a total philistine cos good films transcend their description, they even transcend what they're about... but life's too short. Even though I do really like a lot of those Russian directors to which I assume you're referring.

  15. #780
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Posts
    85

    Default

    The other russians I mean Luposhansky, Aleksei German. I can stomach them as they're atmospheric and slow. Seen others I'm less keen on, festival type films, so not a great criticism of Sokurov. It says on wiki he was deeply influenced by Zerkalo. The other guy that worked with Tarkovsky, Konchalovsky, he took some of that atmosphere with him even when he went to Hollywood. Something in the Soviet water.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •