Page 1 of 47 12311 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 700

Thread: Since it's been a while since we had an Israel/Palestine thread...

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    14,998

    Default Since it's been a while since we had an Israel/Palestine thread...

    ...I just saw this on news.bbc and it looked worth commenting on:

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/mid...st/7181658.stm

    So does anyone think the US will try and make Israel actually, you know, do anything about this?
    Doin' the Lambeth Warp New: DISSENSUS - THE NOVEL - PM me your email address and I'll add you

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    14,998

    Default

    *BUMP*

    In case I didn't make the title of this thread eye-catching enough, the gist of the news piece is that Bush has said "Israel must end occupation of Arab land to enable the creation of a viable Palestinian state", which seems a pretty unequivocal statement that the US will not indulge Israel indefinitely. Anyway, I thought it was worth mentioning! Anyone?
    Doin' the Lambeth Warp New: DISSENSUS - THE NOVEL - PM me your email address and I'll add you

  3. #3

    Default

    Since that would involve both the Israelis and the Palestinians making concessions, do you think it likely?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    14,998

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by vimothy View Post
    Since that would involve both the Israelis and the Palestinians making concessions, do you think it likely?
    I'm sure many Palestinians would, but whether their leadership would is another matter.

    But that's by-the-by, Israel is the side with the all the advantages in this conflict - political, economic and military - so as far as I can see it's up to Israel to make concessions first.
    Doin' the Lambeth Warp New: DISSENSUS - THE NOVEL - PM me your email address and I'll add you

  5. #5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. Tea View Post
    I'm sure many Palestinians would, but whether their leadership would is another matter.

    But that's by-the-by, Israel is the side with the all the advantages in this conflict - political, economic and military - so as far as I can see it's up to Israel to make concessions first.
    It's a bit unrealistic, though. You might want the Israelis to make unilateral concessions in the face of status-quo response from the Palestinians, but will they? I doubt it.

    I'd also question whether many or most Palestinians really do want to make concessions. There are polls on stuff like that. What do they say? For instance, Fatah basically get bribed to become "moderate" by Israel and the US. They use this money to provide kick-backs to their constituents (i.e. winning coalition supporters) in the form of private goods. This hasn't made them very popular for, I think, two reasons. Being moderate is not what the people of Palestine want. A corrupt government is not what the people of Palestine want. I don't see any way round this impass.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    14,998

    Default

    If Israel starts to make some concessions - such as leaving illegally-occupied land and scaling back on the roadblocks and trade restrictions - I think support (from Palestinians) for a more concilliatory, less hardline government would grow. The way things are, it's hardly surprising there's widespread support for a hardline party.
    Doin' the Lambeth Warp New: DISSENSUS - THE NOVEL - PM me your email address and I'll add you

  7. #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. Tea View Post
    If Israel starts to make some concessions - such as leaving illegally-occupied land and scaling back on the roadblocks and trade restrictions - I think support (from Palestinians) for a more concilliatory, less hardline government would grow. The way things are, it's hardly surprising there's widespread support for a hardline party.
    Has that happened in the past? No, I don't think so.

    Multilateralism and unilaterlateralism both produced the same outcome, i.e. no outcome whatsoever.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    3323'S, 7047'W
    Posts
    1,300

    Default

    i don't think it matters what palestinans do, frankly! if hamas is there or not, if they suddenly become loving buddhas, whatever they do they have no freedom of movement, no power beyond the capacity to reproduce, and even then it is undermined by the harsh conditions of life in what is essentially a concentration camp. israel will never give up the territory acquired in 1967 because it feels it was acquired legitimately, it is integral to the national mystique. it will never really oppose settlements because arabs are vermin on soil that is theirs by ancestral right, it falls in line with the silent policy of ethnic cleansing and erasing of palestinian arab identity. i predict they will advance little by little until the hordes self-destruct or agree to have their 1 cm squared state, and if along the way by some miracle they attain enlightenment and renounce all struggle israel will fabricate a pretext to maintain this state of hostility which is requisite for expansion and eventual total victory. i don't see a way out of this.

  9. #9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bruno View Post
    i don't think it matters what palestinans do, frankly! if hamas is there or not, if they suddenly become loving buddhas, whatever they do they have no freedom of movement, no power beyond the capacity to reproduce, and even then it is undermined by the harsh conditions of life in what is essentially a concentration camp. israel will never give up the territory acquired in 1967 because it feels it was acquired legitimately, it is integral to the national mystique. it will never really oppose settlements because arabs are vermin on soil that is theirs by ancestral right, it falls in line with the silent policy of ethnic cleansing and erasing of palestinian arab identity. i predict they will advance little by little until the hordes self-destruct or agree to have their 1 cm squared state, and if along the way by some miracle they attain enlightenment and renounce all struggle israel will fabricate a pretext to maintain this state of hostility which is requisite for expansion and eventual total victory. i don't see a way out of this.
    Not quite. The Palestinians have bargaining chips -- at the very least, the power to fire rockets at Israelis, the power to cause them to become isolated and condemned, etc.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    14,998

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by vimothy View Post
    Not quite. The Palestinians have bargaining chips -- at the very least, the power to fire rockets at Israelis, the power to cause them to become isolated and condemned, etc.
    But even if Fatah were to gain overall control over the Palestinian territories, they wouldn't be able to stop attacks (on Israel) by Hamas or Hizbullah, as Palestine is such a fractured, desperately disorganised country thanks to decades of Israeli aggression. Whereas when the IDF launches this or that campaign, it does so as the military representative of Israel's government. So the Israeli leadership can say it will make withdrawals or other concessions (or could if it wanted to, I mean) but by the very nature of the fucked-up-ness of Palestine, Abbas unfortunately cannot make equivalent promises about the actions of various factions he has no control over, and who may in fact be deeply antagonistic towards him.

    Edit: not really sure where I'm going with this, except to point out that you can't talk about "the Palestinians" as a single military/political entity in the same way you can talk about "the Israelis".
    Doin' the Lambeth Warp New: DISSENSUS - THE NOVEL - PM me your email address and I'll add you

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    3323'S, 7047'W
    Posts
    1,300

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by vimothy View Post
    Not quite. The Palestinians have bargaining chips -- at the very least, the power to fire rockets at Israelis, the power to cause them to become isolated and condemned, etc.
    the power of palestinans to fire rockets will disappear when they themselves have left these lands, i think israel is prepared to see it through. as for condemnation, it doesen't seem to have dampened their spirits so far, jews and israelis in particular pride themselves of having learned to live with hostility. the important thing is to keep your friends close and your enemies closer, they seem to have done this very well.

    Quote Originally Posted by vimothy View Post
    I'd also question whether many or most Palestinians really do want to make concessions. There are polls on stuff like that. What do they say? For instance, Fatah basically get bribed to become "moderate" by Israel and the US. They use this money to provide kick-backs to their constituents (i.e. winning coalition supporters) in the form of private goods. This hasn't made them very popular for, I think, two reasons. Being moderate is not what the people of Palestine want.
    sadly this is true, the whole thing about moderation is that it hasn't got them anywhere either, and since the second intifadah i doubt many people remember what it was like to live in (relative) peace. those that do know that in a state of calm people can start living their lives again, paving the way for eventual understanding, and this would undermine israeli and palestinian narrative.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    3323'S, 7047'W
    Posts
    1,300

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. Tea View Post
    But even if Fatah were to gain overall control over the Palestinian territories, they wouldn't be able to stop attacks (on Israel) by Hamas or Hizbullah, as Palestine is such a fractured, desperately disorganised country thanks to decades of Israeli aggression. Whereas when the IDF launches this or that campaign, it does so as the military representative of Israel's government. So the Israeli leadership can say it will make withdrawals or other concessions (or could if it wanted to, I mean) but by the very nature of the fucked-up-ness of Palestine, Abbas unfortunately cannot make equivalent promises about the actions of various factions he has no control over, and who may in fact be deeply antagonistic towards him.

    Edit: not really sure where I'm going with this, except to point out that you can't talk about "the Palestinians" as a single military/political entity in the same way you can talk about "the Israelis".
    i have doubts about this. a lot of the interviews with hamas spokesmen and fatah people give hints of a deep sympathy amidst the apparently irreconcilable differences. perhaps they each play a role in the same way settlers and moderate israelis play a role? the difference could be in method. i suspect the 'fucked-up-ness' and the fact that palestinans are not very good at public relations may contribute to this perception of total fragmentation.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    14,998

    Default

    You think? I'd got the impression there was basically a pretty deep rift in Palestinian politics. But then, I'm just going on what I see on the BBC for the most part, I don't follow this as closely as some.

    My main point was that there's just one IDF (although of course many settlers are also armed) which enacts the will of the Israeli government, whereas in Palestine there are many (para)military groups with different political allegiances.
    Doin' the Lambeth Warp New: DISSENSUS - THE NOVEL - PM me your email address and I'll add you

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    3323'S, 7047'W
    Posts
    1,300

    Default

    occupied territories is the magic word, this is the main thing. the emphasis today is on islamic radicals vs moderates, tomorrow it will be something else, but one forgets that the common objective is to break free of occupation.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    2

    Default

    i hope i have been following this thread correctly... i am new to this.

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. Tea View Post
    You think? I'd got the impression there was basically a pretty deep rift in Palestinian politics. But then, I'm just going on what I see on the BBC for the most part, I don't follow this as closely as some.
    there is a massive rift in palestinian politics. the people do not know what to do and more importantly who to follow. the fractions which lie within factions politically is immense. i think this is why they are so easily occupied (putting aside that everything is controlled for them, water, even the seeds that they plant in the ground, roads, all of this and more, and obviously access to tools of resistance) the fact that they are such a divided society, lost in ideology and leadership. on one side you have hamas who will not admit israels existance and will do anything to kill its state. to act as a counter part to this there is fateh. vimothy is correct is stating that they are so very currupt and for this reason compromised. in this individuals lose faith. there is so much political confusion is palestine. the only strand of certainty that i found in my interactions with peolple in the west bank is that they are suffering and do not care how this stops, so long as it does, somehow, someday.

    Quote Originally Posted by vimothy View Post
    Since that would involve both the Israelis and the Palestinians making concessions, do you think it likely?
    concessions will be difficult to attain from the palestinian side because (and rightly so) they have been through so much torture. not only phsyically. the daily humiliation which they face is awful, and these are such proud people. children grow up with aggression problems, there is over population, not enough schools. they live an occupied life an do not how to breath another existance. the situation perpetuates with every second psychologically. i cannot speak for anyone, i gather my opinions through conversations which i have had with friends in palestine and others. most admit that israel is now existing and do not think it is worth trying to deny its stamp on the world map. but that the occupation must end.

    what will happen if it was to... i do not know what freedom could be to people who have never had this. the entire situation is an absolute mind field.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •