quick question about how music is recorded

Martin Dust

Techno Zen Master
How come Martin?

It frustrates the hell out of me and I'm much happier making things than working at the mastering stage, lucky for me that Richard is very good at it and Simon is even better. If I'm in the mood I'm OK with it but it mostly bores me after a couple of hours and wears my ears/brain out. I try to work in a two hour blocks and then leave things alone but others I work with are much better at it than me so I prefer to point and say things than have my hads on the controls.
 

mistersloane

heavy heavy monster sound
It frustrates the hell out of me and I'm much happier making things than working at the mastering stage, lucky for me that Richard is very good at it and Simon is even better. If I'm in the mood I'm OK with it but it mostly bores me after a couple of hours and wears my ears/brain out. I try to work in a two hour blocks and then leave things alone but others I work with are much better at it than me so I prefer to point and say things than have my hads on the controls.

Do you master at home or where do Richard and Simon work? PVT if it's too personal a question.
 

Martin Dust

Techno Zen Master
Do you master at home or where do Richard and Simon work? PVT if it's too personal a question.

We have two studios, one in Sheffield and one in Devon. Richard is part of the band and has much better skills than me or Ken at mastering, we all do the fun stuff and Richard uses his bat-like hearing to clean up the mess we make - although we often make sure it isn't cleaned up to much. Simon works at Masterpiece and is someone we've always trusted with our pre-masters.
 

Gabba Flamenco Crossover

High Sierra Skullfuck
Jazz, folk and classical recordings are generally documents of a performance
I see what you mean, but that depends on what you take as a 'documents of a performance'

Yeah, bit of a vague phrase I agree. The second half of that sentence is probably more precise:

the engineers goal is to capture what is happening the studio as accurately as possible.

With pop, rock and dance music, the finished piece is a predetermined masterplan, and all the performances recorded in the studio are tailored to fit into that. Whereas with classical, folk and jazz, the finished piece is what happens when the musicians play - all the engineer does is to get it down into some permanent form. There will always be exceptions on both sides but I think as a general rule that's valid.



the vast majority of classical recordings are spliced together from many takes...

Are you sure about that? The thing about classical music is that the musicians playing it have been chosen purely on the basis of skill, so they should really be capable of playing a piece correctly 1st time. Obviously mistakes do get made, but if it takes more than 3 takes to get a result then something's wrong. Plus there's a serious financial incentive to keep the number of takes low - if you're recording a large-ish orchestra on MU rates, in a studio big enough to hold them, each take will be costing you a couple of grand, maybe more.

I don't know much personally about classical music, but I've got a friend who records orchestral soundtracks for big films - he did the lord of the rings trilogy, and he's doing the new Harry Potter film now. So this is distilled from conversations I've had with him. I know that his philosophy is to get the setup perfect and then get the result in the bag first time, or maybe second time if the musicians need a loosener to get comfortable. I'm sure he has spliced takes together in his time, but only in dire emergencies. That's certainly not how it's supposed to be done.

I suppose I'm talking about the most commercial end of orchestral recording - recording sessions for more specialist art-music pieces might be run differently.

I kind of hate to bring him up (cos it seems to derail threads with bitching about the guy) but Steve Albini's Electric Audio studio at the very least does initial recordings live in a room.

It worth making the point here that mutlitracking and overdubbing are not mutually dependent concepts. For example, if you're recording guitar, you can split the feed to three different amps and put one in a cupboard, one in a ballroom and one in an echo chamber. Then you record each amp to a seperate track, to give yourself more control over the guitar tone at mixdown. That's a multitrack technique, but it's not overdubbing because all the parts go down from the same performance. Engineers like Albini will use techniques like that all the time.

Albini is a great example of how real-time recording doesn't preclude the use of the studio as instrument - the distortion tones he uses are all about experimenting with mic placement and creative abuse of his equipment.

Even when recording a band live you can still record the input of every mic to its own track if you so desire. Others have pointed out some of the limitations of this, but it is possible.

Very difficult with jazz though, for the reasons I outlined in my earlier post. With rock it's common to move the amps out into different rooms to isolate them, so that you can record the band in real time but get completely discrete channels for each instrument. It's also relatively easy to isolate the instruments in classical music because the players are taking thier cues from the score and the conductor, not from each other.


one name: Teo Macero, worked as a Jazz studio producer thru the 60's then the 70's ...........

Cheers for the heads up, people. There's an extensive interview with Teo Macero that's linked from his wikipedia page - he's an interesting guy!

Re the phantom jazz/reggae crossover: it's frustrating, because the guys playing on those old reggae sides were obviously very accomplished players (didn't they all get taught by musical nuns or something? I read about that somewhere). You get flashes of instrumental brilliance every now and again, like that version of 'House Of New Orleans' that's on Kieth Hudson's Pick A Dub. It just needed a Miles Davis figure to pull it into a movement in it's own right. But it never got one :( .
 

hurricane run

Well-known member
"Re the phantom jazz/reggae crossover: it's frustrating, because the guys playing on those old reggae sides were obviously very accomplished players (didn't they all get taught by musical nuns or something? I read about that somewhere). You get flashes of instrumental brilliance every now and again, like that version of 'House Of New Orleans' that's on Kieth Hudson's Pick A Dub. It just needed a Miles Davis figure to pull it into a movement in it's own right. But it never got one ."
Track on lee perry album, musical bones, which gets close. I think Don Drummond played on it.
Jazz in a perry style.
 

mistersloane

heavy heavy monster sound
We have two studios, one in Sheffield and one in Devon. Richard is part of the band and has much better skills than me or Ken at mastering, we all do the fun stuff and Richard uses his bat-like hearing to clean up the mess we make - although we often make sure it isn't cleaned up to much. Simon works at Masterpiece and is someone we've always trusted with our pre-masters.

That's here http://www.masterpiecelondon.com/ right? Sorry bout all the questions but I got something that's gonna have to go through that process soon, and just feeling out the territory!
 

Freakaholic

not just an addiction
Im reading Will Pop Eat Itself right now, and coincidentally just read the part claiming that Walter Legge could have possibly recorded the first multi-take recording. I cant remember the details right now, but I think it was around 1951, and he was recording a song from a Wagner opera, and using the most popular female soprano at the time. It seems, though, that she was getting on in her years, and so could not hit the highest notes. He therefore had another woman (not so coincidentally his wife) come in and sing those notes, and he spliced them into the recording.
 

psherburne

Well-known member
Just wanted to confirm that many classical recordings ARE in fact spliced together from various tapes. I was a page-turner once for a recording of some Bartok (IIRC) violin/piano sonatas being performed by a fairly major American violinist (the pianist was my college piano instructor at the time), I think initially intended for a release on Deutsche Gramofon (though it didn't come out there), and I we recorded many, many takes to be edited together later.
 

nomos

Administrator
Along the same lines, my supervisor at school has been working for months to reconstruct a piece by a particular 20th C composer from reels and reels of takes. The label provided copies of the original material on a hard drive. Then began the detective work and a lot of time in Pro Tools. A problem arose when it seemed that one significant take might still be hiding, unlabeled, on a reel in the label's vaults.
 
Top