This protection racket marketing spiel of yours is somewhat distasteful in the circumstances; you and your imperialist cronies aren't the only people who can provide these services.
Sure I can be beaten but he was the strongest guy in our year.
Sure he dragged me upside down along the ground for 20 metres but he was the strongest guy in our year.
The money paid is far too much for mere access, so clearly the subtext of their paying hugely over the odds is "make us nice news or we'll stop paying".
If the US taxpayer was providing 8% of BBC revenue there are grounds to re-run our election - it's called "foreign interference", you may have heard of it.
If it's just that they got some historically bad deals on subscriptions; you would think that once you're bulk-buying them you'd get a reduction, not having to spend millions to sign up to some website.
Maybe all the meddling gets too complicated and counterproductive - you end up funding some terrorist group that turns into your biggest enemy.
Trump is changing the strategy from one that tries to head every problem off at the pass to just dealing with the big ticket problems e.g. Gaza and...
I don't like the columnist omni-expert conceit, where the same guy gives us his half-baked theories on a vast array of phenomena, very few of which he knows anything about. They should be replaced by a wider range of ad hoc contributors who actually know things.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.