Search results

History repeats on a 2160 year cycle so fingers crossed

I think the local voting at 16 idea is ingenious, and would lower it to 14. I am surprised that woke equity hounds haven't targeted partner choice yet as that is the principal way by which people might improve or consolidate their lot...the dating site filters abet this consolidation but much...

Lots of interesting and righteous ideas. Do you mean equality of opportunity or equity? I take Woke 1 to be a radical equity movement so if it's the latter Woke 2 won't be much different. Woke 2 abortion rights point is a fetishisation and, anyway, viability is irrelevant the wrongness of abortion.

You understood it all so how can it be unclear? And you agree with pretty much all of it so how can it be tosh? You have to answer my central point: why do they play on a losing pitch?

Bad news for the Jump-Psy community

They're only against rational argument because they would lose the trending arguments BUT they only lose because they accept the unspoken assumptions of the opposition, in that they share those assumptions...so the progress required is asking themselves in what kind of world/universe the...

This is the linguistic analogue of Newton's alchemical efforts.

@ghost is confused as to why I bother trying to help him out, so I'm going to provide even more help and tell him and others (you know who you are) how to be a true progressive. 1. Progressives progress. You don't have to wait for everyone in your fake friendship group to emotionally blackmail...

Not everyone but certainly you. I remember you being very selective about who counts as legitimately trans, and I bet you can't give a trans-inclusive definition of womanhood either.

Dissensus may be League 2 but yanqui forums are Vanarama South.

He's perfectly happy for corporations to globalise but not people.

If there was anything about you guys you would be on Mumsnet fighting the good fight, but it looks like there isn't.

All the phony progressives are capitulating.

Republican insider trading on the tariffs?

What did you do to the poor man?

If you're using yourself as a benchmark to judge "adjustment" (a bourgeois concept if ever there was one) then all bets are off.

So to the non-narcissists...how are you going to win back ground lost to the gender-critical? There are flaws in their arguments but not the ones you think; you're going to have to stop being so culturally Conservative to spot them

So you've come to the same conclusion just through illogical means.

Liked by all the plastic progressives who have messed things up for the people they claim to be helping, yet again cf Israel thread.

Is there some sort of argument struggling to emerge from your cranium?