Search results

∫₀^∞ [Innovation(t) * Privatization(t)] dt − lim_(☭→Breadline, Plan→Shortage) CommunistSystem(☭, Plan) + Σₖ=₁^∞ [InvisibleHand(StockMarket) / ConsumerChoice(k)] = CapitalistVictory * (McDonalds(1989) / Marx(1848))

this is just great

i read a good description recently that western communists of today are like enternal twenty year olds; because when you twenty your into all sort of stupid stuff, maybe one even reads Chomsky or has a t-shirt of a really shitty band or gets into some "edgy" subculture, you know, whatever weak...

probably the reason why you met her in London; because that's where eastern europeans send their all losers, thiefs, freaks and basketcases

isn't the corect marxist term "pushing synthesis" though?

so basically the aim of communism is to stop people eating something that tastes like chalk and insted to make them consume an actual chalk, the real existing chalk?

The problem is that dialectics as such, as I have tried to elaborate here, is entirely faulty framework.

that acreil guy's stuff i have actually noticed long time ago when i was looking up something regarding pure data, but had completley forgotten about it. wild stuff.

seems like a thriving microgenre

https://bandcamp.com/discover/xenharmonic - a pretty massive list just on bandcamp there's also a podcast dedicated to just that (obviously not only electronica though) - https://nowandxen.libsyn.com/

it's not a node i'm particulary familiar with, but just through a cursory search with our military grade search engines, there seems to be a loads and loads. dunno, just some random results

''there's always a man somwhere, blaming the faults of his feet on his shoes" I think that was the quote from Waiting for Godot, something like that anyway

the only problem with music, if you want to see is as a problem, is that there's way too much of it to proces, too many nodes to connect to and it has mostly departed from meatworld to digital realm. like the guy before said that there are no experimentations with alternate tunings within...

it's also worth mentioning, which i think ties in with a lot of talk about capitalism/neoliberalism and media saturation, which seem the two big topics on many minds, that there is deffo a difference regarding velocity or more precisley - how effectivley each system can communicate with the help...

ok, on a empirical level then. because they obviously function somehow. all these seperate things - like football games, traffic, computers, courts, markets, media systems, political parties it all functions around us all the time. so how do they? (no collectivley, but as seperate entities, of...

so you don't agree that they function based on these binaries?

the legal system doesn’t borrow market logic - it resolves financial disputes with its own code (legal/illegal). market transactions can only happen within market itself (payment/non-payment). those are paraller systems. if court forces somone to pay a fine it's not following market code of...

when you say that systems like law or the economy are “static” because they rely on fixed codes (legal/illegal, payment/ non-payment), you’re missing the point. the systems aren’t rigid , they’re dynamic, self-sustaining processes. it's like software - each runs on its own code, constantly...

that's why he also thinks post-modern is a nonsense term, because there is modern, functionally differentiated society for couple of centuries; there are no real breaks since moving away from stratified society