Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: being Cyborg

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    لندورا
    Posts
    3,585

    Default being Cyborg

    http://www.independent.co.uk/life-st...-a7674991.html silly article but doubtless it is a phenomenon that is impending. the machines are making us become more and more like them, rather than vice versa, is my current working hypothesis

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    1,475

    Default The singularity/cyborgs/transhumans

    Is this really coming in the next 50 years, or it just hard sci-fi?

    "We are entering a new era. I call it "the Singularity." It's a merger between human intelligence and machine intelligence is going to create something bigger than itself. It's the cutting edge of evolution on our planet. One can make a strong case that it's actually the cutting edge of the evolution of intelligence in general, because there's no indication that it's occurred anywhere else. To me that is what human civilization is all about. It is part of our destiny and part of the destiny of evolution to continue to progress ever faster, and to grow the power of intelligence exponentially.To contemplate stopping that to think human beings are fine the way they are is a misplaced fond remembrance of what human beings used to be. What human beings are is a species that has undergone a cultural and technological evolution, and it's the nature of evolution that it accelerates, and that its powers grow exponentially, and that's what we're talking about. The next stage of this will be to amplify our own intellectual powers with the results of our technology."

    https://www.edge.org/conversation/ra...he-singularity

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to Bang Diddley For This Useful Post:


  4. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    لندورا
    Posts
    3,585

    Default

    i just discovered this - totally fucking brilliant

    https://www.faculty.umb.edu/gary_zab..._manifesto.pdf

    A Cyborg Manifesto
    Donna Haraway
    Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century," in Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature(New York; Routledge, 1991), pp.149-181.

    An ironic dream of a common language for women in the integrated circuit

    This chapter is an effort to build an ironic political myth faithful to feminism, socialism, and materialism. Perhaps more faithful as blasphemy is faithful, than as reverent worship and identification. Blasphemy has always seemed to require taking things very seriously. I know no better stance to adopt from within the secular-religious, evangelical traditions of United States politics, including the politics of socialist feminism. Blasphemy protects one from the moral majority within, while still insisting on the need for community. Blasphemy is not apostasy. Irony is about contradictions that do not resolve into larger wholes, even dialectically, about the tension of holding incompatible things together because both or all are necessary and true. Irony is about humour and serious play. It is also a rhetorical strategy and a political method, one I would like to see more honoured within socialist-feminism. At the centre of my ironic faith, my blasphemy, is the image of the cyborg.

    A cyborg is a cybernetic organism, a hybrid of machine and organism, a creature of social reality as well as a creature of fiction. Social reality is lived social relations, our most important political construction, a world-changing fiction. The international women's movements have constructed 'women's experience', as well as uncovered or discovered this crucial collective object. This experience is a fiction and fact of the most crucial, political kind. Liberation rests on the construction of the consciousness, the imaginative apprehension, of oppression, and so of possibility. The cyborg is a matter of fiction and lived experience that changes what counts as women's experience in the late twentieth century. This is a struggle over life and death, but the boundary between science fiction and social reality is an optical illusion.

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    لندورا
    Posts
    3,585

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sufi View Post
    i just discovered this - totally fucking brilliant

    https://www.faculty.umb.edu/gary_zab..._manifesto.pdf
    sheeeit! she got herself cancelled https://totalitariancollectivist.wor...eco-bantustan/

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    لندورا
    Posts
    3,585

    Default

    I would love to write something that gets a review like this

    This is a book that contradicts itself a hundred times; but that is not a criticism of it, because its author thinks contradictions are a sign of intellectual ferment and vitality. This is a book that systematically distorts and selects historical evidence; but that is not a criticism, because its author thinks that all interpretations are biased, and she regards it as her duty to pick and choose her facts to favor her own brand of politics. This is a book full of vaporous, French-intellectual prose that makes Teilhard de Chardin sound like Ernest Hemingway by comparison; but that is not a criticism, because the author likes that sort of prose and has taken lessons in how to write it, and she thinks that plain, homely speech is part of a conspiracy to oppress the poor. This is a book that clatters around in a dark closet of irrelevancies for 450 pages before it bumps accidentally into its index and stops; but that is not a criticism, either, because its author finds it gratifying and refreshing to bang unrelated facts together as a rebuke to stuffy minds. This book infuriated me; but that is not a defect in it, because it is supposed to infuriate people like me, and the author would have been happier still if I had blown out an artery. In short, this book is flawless, because all its deficiencies are deliberate products of art. Given its assumptions, there is nothing here to criticize. The only course open to a reviewer who dislikes this book as much as I do is to question its author's fundamental assumptions—which are big-ticket items involving the nature and relationships of language, knowledge, and science.

  7. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to sufi For This Useful Post:


  8. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    لندورا
    Posts
    3,585

    Default

    I've been sketching some ideas of what physical form a dissensus cyborg might take were it to assume a non-virtual existence

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •