josef k
- Thread starter vimothy
- Start date
-
- Tags
- aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa argument by tag seems like an odd hobby at least we can spell clever you bellend autistic foreplay autoflatular narcosis barty's entertainment bell end pantomime cancelled concerned parent craner's aggressive gargling lounge act den of despair disgusting old men erectile dysfunction finger wagging i blame twitter i've got mates intervention john's mates josef and his technicoloured meme coat josef k's sick burns kanye without the talent meritless thread no wonder brits sneeked into ira centcom north london house mafia not angry just disappointed not what john was hoping for orange penguin bars paying dress up piety as surrogate sexual dominance sebastian semantic apocalypse now she's not going to fuck you!!! sid viscous vs robocock such bloody awful poetry the evola virus trying to shag a lecturer half my age turd reich vanquishing the goblin nonce vim's sensual meringue hostility group vimothy killed jungle vimothy's hectoring wait till dad gets home we're not going to shag her joe what are you trying to achieve? what is the end goal? what is the point of this thread? who cares? world's worst dinner party you lot aren't as cleaver as you think z haterzzzzzzz
Mr. Tea
Let's Talk About Ceps
I'd say about 60:40.
Leo
Well-known member
just to be clear: I was speaking about Justin RE: the abortion/necro tweet, not anyone here.
Mr. Tea
Let's Talk About Ceps
YEAH GET IT RIGHT, LEFTY LOSERS!!!
IdleRich
IdleRich
OK good to know. So if you strip away the stuff that is not true what remains is really a disagreement about feminism and so on. Serious disagreements perhaps but not beyond the pale in the same as way as supporting Turkic neo nazis...
luka
Well-known member
You can read this thread for an idea of what people are objecting to, particularly Edens and Baboons posts. Or if you want to know what their peers/rivals/acolytes think search twitter.
luka
Well-known member
For instance this account, which for some reason, a mistake or misapprehension presumably, follows me
https://mobile.twitter.com/cloutsky
https://mobile.twitter.com/cloutsky
IdleRich
IdleRich
I mean the Nazi accusation stuff, nothing said by you or Baboon. If I wasn't clear.
Mr. Tea
Let's Talk About Ceps
It's just such a bizarre accusation though, isn't it? I mean, of all the forms of far-right ideology that a couple of white academics in England in 2019 might be into, is it likely to be a Pan-Turkic-nationalist terror group?
Leo
Well-known member
the blog post John eden shared (https://write.as/7v8fbjq9ekoaxl3z.md) has as it's lead image the two of them making that hand gesture, though. I didn't watch enough of the video to see it happen, so no idea of the context.
luka
Well-known member
What it means is that they are Satan worshipping puppets of the illuminati https://www.google.com/search?q=ill...hUFuHEKHZswCksQ_AUoAXoECAwQAQ&biw=320&bih=452
Leo
Well-known member
even better!
like I said, I didn't watch the video to that point, so I have no idea why they were making that hand gesture.
Not being familiar with individuals involved or the authors they seem to favour, I do not feel very comfortable commenting. But I would like to point out that re-reading 'burned'/ dubious/forgotten/expulsed.... authors is a rather common practice. Take the postion of Carl Schmitt in Agamben's work --or in Chantal Mouffe's. Claiming that such return to questionable authors is not a stunt is both true and false: in the best cases it surfaces questions that couldn't be posed otherwise. But even then, it certainly participates in the search for something 'new' and distinctive to say and the symbolic profits to reap from the acquired intellectual position. It just seems that the persons involved here aren't very good at it.