you answered the easy one!
Cringe is increasing alongside the disparity between our new-found curated social profiles and our (shrinking?) internal selves.
As we dematerialise and externalise, it's more and more difficult to find the way back to our private identities, and so cringe could be a way to detect when the disparity is too great to sustain, or a route back to where we left our 'real' personalities, or a sign that a bit has dropped off?
is the antidote is to deal with people who know both sides of those identities? not just online, but also with other projected fake identities, like the 'work' persona - always a scene of concealed urges & secretive off-the-books happenings - which could trigger cringe as well as bigger repercussions, like getting sacked
This is the double effect of the described context of affect-oriented politics: While on the one hand it has caused powerful feeling states, such as vicarious embarrassment, shame, or guilt (Glenn and Haberman, 2017), Trump's norm transgressive behavior also seems to be particularly appealing, because of the expressed repulsive emotions it causes.
"Trump's norm transgressive behavior also seems to be particularly appealing, because of the expressed repulsive emotions it causes."
This, I think, is also where is reputation (at least among supporters) as being a "straight-talking guy who tells it like it is" comes from - in contrast to the fact that, even by the standards we've come to expect from politicians, he is egregiously dishonest and is scarcely capable of opening his mouth or picking up his phone without coming out with a whopper.
There's also the interesting fact that, very occasionally, he bluntly tells a truth where an Obama, a Clinton or probably even a Bush would have lied, such as saying (in so many words), "No we're not going to suspend relations with the Saudis because they're too important to us as allies in the Middle East" after they had that journalist brutally murdered.
There's also the interesting fact that, very occasionally, he bluntly tells a truth where an Obama, a Clinton or probably even a Bush would have lied, such as saying (in so many words), "No we're not going to suspend relations with the Saudis because they're too important to us as allies in the Middle East" after they had that journalist brutally murdered.
He also said they were in Syria for the oil.
I'm telling' ya, trump's an evil genius. lazy, juvenile, bumbling, lucky and not particularly bright, but an evil genius.
Still takes some going to top this utter gem
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/north_west/3664381.stm