Page 21 of 21 FirstFirst ... 11192021
Results 301 to 309 of 309

Thread: "Chav - the Musical"

  1. #301
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    18,390

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mixed_biscuits View Post
    What's the point of our having the impression that we have free will, if we actually don't?
    To stop us all killing ourselves in the face of ultimate cosmic futility?
    Quote Originally Posted by woops
    i hate sigs

  2. #302
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    3,151

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. Tea View Post
    To stop us all killing ourselves in the face of ultimate cosmic futility?
    Yeah but you couldn't even decide to do that if you wanted to, in fact you couldn't even want to.

  3. #303
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    1,505

    Default

    Sorry i ducked out for a bit, don't have much time at the moment. Gek pretty much said what I would've wanted to anyway (although more articulately!). Some interesting ideas coming out

    Quote Originally Posted by noel emits View Post
    Yeah but you couldn't even decide to do that if you wanted to, in fact you couldn't even want to.
    Is it not the case that you could indeed want to, but that that want would have been formed by processes outside of your control? Similarly, you could make the decision, but the decision is simply a result of the interaction of various formative factors, over which you have no discretion (other than the discretion afforded by the interaction of various other formative factors, over which you have no discretion, etc etc)?

    Quite inarticulate, sorry

  4. #304
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    3,151

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by elgato View Post
    Sorry i ducked out for a bit, don't have much time at the moment. Gek pretty much said what I would've wanted to anyway (although more articulately!). Some interesting ideas coming out



    Is it not the case that you could indeed want to, but that that want would have been formed by processes outside of your control? Similarly, you could make the decision, but the decision is simply a result of the interaction of various formative factors, over which you have no discretion (other than the discretion afforded by the interaction of various other formative factors, over which you have no discretion, etc etc)?

    Quite inarticulate, sorry
    No I understand what you're saying. I think it makes a difference what your definition of 'you' is.

    Anyone arguing for the reality of genuine volition would I think have to be going beyond regular causality to explain it anyway.

  5. #305
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    3,151

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. Tea View Post
    To stop us all killing ourselves in the face of ultimate cosmic futility?
    I keep reading this as "killing ourselves in the face".

  6. #306
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    18,390

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by noel emits View Post
    I keep reading this as "killing ourselves in the face".
    It's the best way to do it.
    Quote Originally Posted by woops
    i hate sigs

  7. #307
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Reading (A rotten town)
    Posts
    2,130

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by h-crimm View Post
    My point is; Quantum mechanical probability is a false alternative to determinism. QM is deterministic. But the things which are determined are different to the things we classically expect. The wavefunction, and the evolution in time of the wavefunction are determined. The statistical behaviour of the system is determined, but the individual action is only predicted.
    If there was a complete QM model for the brain this probability still leaves no room for an external volition to choose a particular result from those probabilistically allowed.
    This is pretty much my position: the mere fact that things at a quantum level operate under principles of statistical chance rather than clockwork mechanics doesn't alter the fact that there appears to be little room for genuine volition here. The observer problem thing twists things in another direction entirely tho (as well as quantum electro dynamics and the implications for causation and time). However I am not overly happy with the gross anthroprocentricism the observer problem implies...

  8. #308
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    18,390

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gek-opel View Post
    This is pretty much my position: the mere fact that things at a quantum level operate under principles of statistical chance rather than clockwork mechanics doesn't alter the fact that there appears to be little room for genuine volition here.
    Despite being 'pro-choice' (rofl) in the larger argument, I'd have to agree that mere randomness does not imply free will by itself: if you are somehow compelled to act one way or another according to the throw of a die or the toss of a coin, you have no more free will than if you're compelled to simply do whatever some else tells you to.

    But talking of quantum mechanics and brains brings me back to the point I raised upthread: namely, if you're prepared to believe that the several pounds of offal in your head can somehow spontaneously give rise to intelligence, isn't it possible that free will emerges in a similar way?
    Quote Originally Posted by woops
    i hate sigs

  9. #309
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Reading (A rotten town)
    Posts
    2,130

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. Tea View Post
    Despite being 'pro-choice' (rofl) in the larger argument, I'd have to agree that mere randomness does not imply free will by itself: if you are somehow compelled to act one way or another according to the throw of a die or the toss of a coin, you have no more free will than if you're compelled to simply do whatever some else tells you to.

    But talking of quantum mechanics and brains brings me back to the point I raised upthread: namely, if you're prepared to believe that the several pounds of offal in your head can somehow spontaneously give rise to intelligence, isn't it possible that free will emerges in a similar way?
    I like the offal imagery Mr Tea but I don't think that self-awareness necessarily implies free will. Also the brain-meat doesn't just spontaneously give rise to intelligence in a vacuum does it? Although the question of how physical matter can give rise to self-awareness is interesting I'm not sure how much self-awareness merely creates an illusion of free will.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •