People tend to have their favoured lenses and frameworks, but what lies outside them? What happens to academia, media criticism, and so on, if we hypothetically rule out mentioning capitalism, or race, or gender, or any of the other go-tos? What's discussed instead?
Wondered this after reading...
awful tags
feminazis
from beyond
gender theory
jamaican voodoogangfrom marked for death >
jamaican voodoogangfrompredator2pussyclaatvoodoogangfrompredator2
tag!
the sub-prime tag crisis
version is an elitist tagger
virtue signaling
wokeism
wokeness
...I just saw this on news.bbc and it looked worth commenting on:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/7181658.stm
So does anyone think the US will try and make Israel actually, you know, do anything about this?
0898-biscetti
barf emoji
basking perchance
childlike tripe
craner's been mossad from day one
craner's philosemitic pussy eating poetry
dissensus gets fatwa'd
fatwa sex
hmt govt hat keinen schwand
jamaican voodoogangfrompredator2
knob v cretin
linebaugh's balls ground into dust
mixed biscuits dumped his pregnant girlfriend
mixed biscuits is a virgin but he has clamydia
mixed biscuits: jew for jesus
nastiness
new tab for trotsky
proxy wars
pussyclaatvoodoogangfrompredator2
strictly for the consequentialist
tea and biscuits
the cancellation of stan
the fundamentalist core of mr tea
the hegel reference
the lust to execute oliver craner
the mythifus of sisyphus
third cares for his okra
third neglects his okra
third puts okra up his bum
underschooled undergrads
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.