i remember craner indignantly telling vim it doesnt matter anymore the world is one smooth space but vim loves his cool topographical maps and irreducible geographical features
area is important but it also depends on what it is comprised of. what grows there. what shape it is. what the borders are. whether you can reach the sea. energy reserves. minerals. crop yields. what population it can carry.So I guess the first salient geopolitical feature is area.
no. vim is really into geopolitics these days. he was saying that the ukraine invasion made sense in terms of geopolitics, or that it was even justifable on those terms. and craner wasn't having it he said there is no geopolitics.
anyone into mountain ranges, coastal plains, warm water ports, oil pipelines etc?
the great chessboard, aleksander dugin, Zbigniew Brzezinski. backwards hill peoples and so on
i remember craner indignantly telling vim it doesnt matter anymore the world is one smooth space but vim loves his cool topographical maps and irreducible geographical features
This is the problem with seeing the world only through the prism of economics. You miss out ideas, ideologies, passions, hatreds, cosmic visions, fate, chance, tragedy and victory. Putin is finished. Tyranny has overplayed its hand. This is the narrative of history.
i think he bridles at the idea that geography is destiny. he likes to cling on to the notion of individual agency. men making decisions. whereas theres a snse with geopolitics that the land forces states into taking the actions that they take. that there is an inevitability about the invasion of ukraine that is determined by its position on the map.I'm sure there's room for geography in this and that Craner isn't one of those smooth space men.