sus
Moderator
Alternate title because I'm happy with neither: "Pop Songs That Are Becoming Folk Songs"
This one's really for the Americans, @line b @kid charlemagne @Ian Scuffling @mvuent but obviously Brits are welcome to contribute
The idea is this: Folks songs, musicologically (not pop folk acts like the Lumineers, but Alan Lomax shit) are songs in an oral tradition, with diasporic variants, whose original writers have faded into obscurity. (Or which lack a single canonical author)
So this thread is for "pop songs"—musicologically, songs written for recording/commercial distribution, with a clear writer/origin point—which could plausibly become or are becoming de facto folk standards in the American canon. You could imagine that in 2150, they're still widely known, your average suburbanite can sing along to some of the verses, but the original writer is largely forgotten
("Standards," "Great American Songbook" capture this notion but are more jazz or folk focused, respectively)
This one's really for the Americans, @line b @kid charlemagne @Ian Scuffling @mvuent but obviously Brits are welcome to contribute
The idea is this: Folks songs, musicologically (not pop folk acts like the Lumineers, but Alan Lomax shit) are songs in an oral tradition, with diasporic variants, whose original writers have faded into obscurity. (Or which lack a single canonical author)
So this thread is for "pop songs"—musicologically, songs written for recording/commercial distribution, with a clear writer/origin point—which could plausibly become or are becoming de facto folk standards in the American canon. You could imagine that in 2150, they're still widely known, your average suburbanite can sing along to some of the verses, but the original writer is largely forgotten
("Standards," "Great American Songbook" capture this notion but are more jazz or folk focused, respectively)