Interiors

version

Well-known member
Just been reading about William Randolph Hearst buying not just artifacts but entire rooms and having them transported across the Atlantic:

Entire historic interiors would be acquired – panelling, fireplaces, doors, paintings, timbers and plaster ceilings, libraries and tapestries -

Bizarre to read about a room going missing and being stored somewhere. It's like something out of Borges:

In the 1990s, the owners of Gwydir traced one of the castle’s two missing interiors, a 1640s room, to the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York, which acquired it from Hearst. The room had been stored at the museum for decades, and the owners bought and reinstated it.

guardian.com/culture/2017/mar/05/art-historians-seek-missing-uk-treasures-us-hearst-hoard-return-to-britain
 

version

Well-known member

SILENCIO%20NYC%203%20-%20PAULINE%20SHAPIRO.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: RWY

version

Well-known member
watched Stigmata last night and the best thing about it was the production design; Patricia Arquette's a Pittsburgh hairdresser living in a huge Art Deco meets late '90s apartment.

Screenshot from 2024-03-05 18-15-43.png

Screenshot from 2024-03-05 18-16-25.png
 

version

Well-known member
Baudrillard, The System of Objects

It's good, this. He's talking about how interior design was once based around furniture that represented morals and the patriarchal system, but evolved into functional objects and became more about how these objects inhabited space, related to one another, and the creation of 'atmosphere'.
 

craner

Beast of Burden
It's good, this. He's talking about how interior design was once based around furniture that represented morals and the patriarchal system, but evolved into functional objects and became more about how these objects inhabited space, related to one another, and the creation of 'atmosphere'.

It's the best of his boring ones.
 

version

Well-known member
I know, it's really great the moment he just thinks "fuck it" and lets go. Fatal Strategies was the moment, I think. Wasn't it?

Yeah, sounds about right. He always had a bit of the prankster in him, but it seems like he also wanted to be accepted by the academy up until some point in the 80s when he turned into "Baudrillard".
 

craner

Beast of Burden
It took him all of the 70s to realise that the 60s had rejected him, so he took his revenge by defining the 80s.
 

craner

Beast of Burden
There's definitely an edge of resentment in Baudrillard and it's not just 'Forget Foucault' that gives the game away.
 

version

Well-known member
You can see the seeds of later Baudrillard in this:

"One material sums up the idea of atmosphere and may be thought of as embodying a universal function in the modern environment. That material is GLASS. Advertising calls it 'the material of the future' - a future which, as we all know, will itself be 'transparent'. Glass is thus both the material used and the ideal to be achieved, both end and means. So much for metaphysics."

That excerpt preempts our discussion of 'dematerialisation' and 'the new transparency' by about fifty years.

" - the miracle of a rigid fluid - "
 
Top