I just don't get where this discussion stands in relation to that complaint in the 'music journo hall of shame thread' a while back about the fact that nobody behaves like they're intervening in a cultural war any more, the stakes are too low, there's no passion or fervency attached to taste etc. etc.
i thought we were engaging in that here, between those who hate keane, and those who like them, such as myself. boyd set it off with an earnest support of the band, and i really like that he didnt once feel he needed to address the arguments of those who dont like them (he prob just doesnt know), he was completely sincere. and thats a lot of what cultural wars are about isnt it? totally believing in the music you like.
i used to hate travis, coldplay etc etc for being all mopey and i sometimes still do but i think they have some great melodies too. so even if keane are soul music for bullingdon alumni, doesnt mean they cant transcend that or that ppl not from that background cant feel it or that it has no emotional resonance (do wonder if a lot of ppl's hate for them is for how blatantly m/c they are). i actually have a relative who really liked their older stuff and hes as far from their social background as you can imagine and i dont think he likes their stuff for its aspirationally m/c qualities (actually its prob more that hes just getting old and they appeal to his MOR side - used to be into electro and soul etc). what im saying is that boyd is actually engaging, instigating even, the pop battle lines/pop-tribe war etc (hes just not on the 'right'/cool side of the cultural war it seems), people are just too above it all, too above the idea of claiming allegiance to a scene/style, or one band, too above really LOVING something, to really entertain that someone writing about keane could be serious. which says it all really. thats the real problem, not really willing to go tow to tow for what you like.