sadmanbarty
Well-known member
you look back over the smiths oevre and at some point you have to think to yourself "what difference does it make?"
it makes none si.
it makes none si.
but then they clicked with me, the magic made itself apparent
yes, it is part of a broader cultural retreat from rave utopia.
i didn't see your earlier replies to my first sally
yes, exactly what you say there... a backing away from the postpunk principles
BUT the point is.... pop music, or popular music, moves dialectically (i think that's the right word)
postpunk became a dead end, it pursued its logic or rather its various directions until they became barren and worse than that, familiar
you had the Cabaret Voltaires and then you had second-wave sub-Cabaret Voltaires or sub-A Certain Ratios that were just repeating the formula - bands you most likely would never have heard of, for good reason, like Hula or Chakk
and even Cabaret Voltaire themselves kind of stuck, they went as far as they could with that sound, and then tried to take it a little bit mainstream, that didn't work
A certain Ratio decided they wanted to make proper black-sounding records and ended up like Level 42 shadowed by a vague unease
so what is the swerve out of that dead end?
for a lot of people at that time, rediscovering elements of Sixties music did seem like, if not the Way Ahead, then somewhere to go - and bringing back certain things that had been lost (a new approach to the love song
others soldiered on as if postpunk never stopped - so you had a band like Nitzer Ebb which was essentially a DAF tribute band. all of that Electronic Body Music.
BUT the point is.... pop music, or popular music, moves dialectically
can you remember exactly how it happened? what clicked? when?
or you could go to 80s rnb/boogie, early house imports. fatback, c abrams etc.
did anyone do this?
be contradictory then luke. let it all out. consistency is the currency of the redundant.
a glamorisation of isolation and misery that was quite destructive and imprisoning