Because I know you all were just dying to know!If I were to make a metaphysical teleological argument for technocapitalism now, it would be in the conceptual vein of negative entropy, of systems becoming more and more efficient in terms of resource management and energy expenditure, reducing largely to the health and nutrition of bioenergetic subsystems like us humans.
This is like asking if someone's into weapons, beyond guns and blades.Ill intent, beyond being pro-capital and pro-tech in general?
Yeah it is an often unfortunate effect this kind of discourse spewing has.you need to start chiselling your arguments apart Stan. you need to start cleaving.
That's what you were doing though. You picked the two primary tools for doing basically anything in this world and asked for ill intent that didn't fall within favouring either of them.Strikes me as reductio ad absurdum, to reduce technological innovation down to ill intent, but maybe I am missing something.
I meant to ask for pro-tech and pro-capital approaches that weren't just ill-intent.That's what you were doing though. You picked the two primary tools for doing basically anything in this world and asked for ill intent that didn't fall within favouring either of them.
As in, the areas of pro-tech and pro-capital that don't overlap with the area of ill intent.I meant to ask for pro-tech and pro-capital approaches that weren't just ill-intent.