Simon silverdollarcircle
Well-known member
I think your OP is interesting and accurate in articulating one of strongest repeating themes over the last year or so, since this place came back to life
.
Yes as someone who was on dissensus lots years ago and then took years out and returned to the fold quite recently the biggest change has been this. People are vvtey comfortable describing things like jungle or drill as magic, or having magical elements.
Back in the early days of dissensus I think the standard view was the opposite. I remember Martin Clark/blackdown had this dichotomy of real/urban/clear-eyed and unsentimental music (jungle, grime, dubstep) which was opposed to what he saw as the mystical, fantasising, blurry eyed rave stuff (which he was pretty disparaging about). But now we've switched it and put the music that dissensus tends to like on the latter side. jungle etc has become magic not "real". I'm all for this.
But it makes me wonder what's happened, or more precisely what's happened to us? Because the music itself hasn't changed but we're hearing it differently, talking about it differently
My theory is that in the olden days dissensus had a lot of people who were someone directly involved, in varying extents, to the scene. They were meeting people who made and DJed grime and dubstep etc, through running labels or promoting nights or journalism or sometimes just doing it directly themselves (Logan Sama used to be a regular dissensian!) And that kept the discussion very much grounded in the "real"
Whereas now I might be wrong but I don't think there's that direct link to the creation of dissensus musics anymore. So it's music that exists in our heads rather than out in the world. And we can create our own way of hearing and speaking about this music. And it can sprout off in weird directions in our minds and become magical.
That's my theory. My other theory is that collectively we've done a lot more psychedelics in the intervening years
Last edited: