Clinamenic
Binary & Tweed
I'm starting to see how matter is only a relevant concept at certain scales, and how energy and mass are related.
Does quantum field theory imply that the quantized "nature" of energy is more of an artifact of our perception than it is an absolute characteristic of the universe?I'm just starting to attempt to wrap my mind around fields instead of particles, how energy fluctuations beyond certain thresholds in certain fields register to us, perceptually, as particles.
you tell us stan we're all stupidDoes quantum field theory imply that the quantized "nature" of energy is more of an artifact of our perception than it is an absolute characteristic of the universe?
No, it's not just an epistemological artefact, although it is sometimes presented like that at undergraduate level, typically in terms of how you can only probe a particle's position or moment by hitting it with other particles. Rather, it does seem to be an intrinsic and unavoidable feature of reality.Does quantum field theory imply that the quantized "nature" of energy is more of an artifact of our perception than it is an absolute characteristic of the universe?
Jiddu KrishnamurtiIt touched upon Bohm's friendship with that theosophist prodigy, forget his name...
Jiddu Krishnamurti
this is like @Clinamenic catniplook up hidden variables, pilot wave theory, EPR paradox, Bell's theorem, Alain Aspect, David Bohm.
Every possibly fork exists in simultaneity.Could we leverage EPR to build a quantum blockchain, though?
Or quockchain, as it were.Could we leverage EPR to build a quantum blockchain, though?