luka
Well-known member
Actually it's the other way around, she's more conservative in that respect
Would you describe yourself as a grower or a shower?
Actually it's the other way around, she's more conservative in that respect
basically it's not unreasonable to say things like, "it's more natural for ppl to live in the countryside than the city". it's not necessarily true (or false), and it might be a cliche or whatever, but it's not a meaningless or incoherent claim
I don't think this is a helpful question for you to occupy yourself withWould you describe yourself as a grower or a shower?
And that question might lead you to eat brown rice and vegetables, drastically cut down on your drinking and keep a regular appointment with Adrienne like me or it might lead you to drink red wine everyday, deadlift, and eat nothing but steak like HMG....its unpredictable....
Horseshoe theory, Dissensus-style!Yes. It's worth doing something. My approach is based on millions of years of history and unconfined rationality, yours on commune with the Godhead and mortification of the flesh. Both valid.
Sausage casseroles and radio 4 level popular science, not so much.
the other thing to take into account is that what is 'natural' to a domestic or farm animal may not neccessarily be in its own best interests and the task may be to unplug the natural impulses and discover a freedom from the dictates of a preprogrammed 'nature'
Isn't brown rice the one with the highest concentration of arsenic?
This will become personally relevant to you when, having forgotten how deeply and truly you felt your wife's love for you on your wedding day, you subsequently submit her to a barrage of tests including skin galvanic response, pupil tracking, heart rate monitoring etc. after which you are forced to conclude that your intuition may have been to some extent correct.as the "scientific" increases in sophistication it comes back around to resemble pre-scientific knowledge.
a neat idea i think.