The idea of a public or private panopticon is enough to sink the notion of a CBDC in the US, you're right. Even if its technically inaccurate.
The lack of deposit insurance is a drawback for holding any assets on custodial crypto exchanges, for sure. The main advantage of using stablecoins is really composability, a benefit the nuance of which is lost on most people. Plus, barring mixer/tumbler protocols and a couple other confusing things, on-chain accounting should be significantly easier than off-chain accounting.the problem us authorities face is that, if they want the banking system to manage a CBDC (since they dont want to manage the liability side, or damage the financial system), it's not obvious what the advantages of a CBDC are from a consumers POV versus a deposit held a bank which is covered by deposit insurance.
its interesting how cypto and bit coin went from being this secretive thing that nobody could really tell what it was being used for to gamblingThe lack of deposit insurance is a drawback for holding any assets on custodial crypto exchanges, for sure. The main advantage of using stablecoins is really composability, a benefit the nuance of which is lost on most people. Plus, barring mixer/tumbler protocols and a couple other confusing things, on-chain accounting should be significantly easier than off-chain accounting.
Honestly the buying power argument has some legs to it here. Certain tokens allow governance rights within DAOs, and certain DAOs directly manage protocols, so anyone can buy governance power in the web3 layer of the internet.its interesting how cypto and bit coin went from being this secretive thing that nobody could really tell what it was being used for to gambling
or if you listen to certain black capitalists the way black people can "liberate" themselves from the grip of banks etc etc its just the ancient argument about "buying power" but with a slightly more libertarian bent to it
No bike jokes?
I don't think stable coins are the relevant comparison for most ppl. most ppl hold deposit accounts with banks in the tradfi system. what's the advantage, to them, of a central bank digital currency, held at and managed by their bank?The lack of deposit insurance is a drawback for holding any assets on custodial crypto exchanges, for sure. The main advantage of using stablecoins is really composability, a benefit the nuance of which is lost on most people. Plus, barring mixer/tumbler protocols and a couple other confusing things, on-chain accounting should be significantly easier than off-chain accounting.
Yeah to me CBDCs are only interesting if we're talking about stablecoins, which isn't a given. Short of leveraging that technology, I really don't see the point of a CBDC, and if anything I'd have reservations about the prospects. Maybe there are good arguments, I'm just not aware of them.I don't think stable coins are the relevant comparison for most ppl. most ppl hold deposit accounts with banks in the tradfi system. what's the advantage, to them, of a central bank digital currency, held at and managed by their bank?
"Haha, he fell off his bike, the silly decrepit old cunt! Hahaha!!!"No bike jokes?
You are literally invulnerable to concept of irony, aren't you?Anyone been following the latest story about the least popular President in history's ghastly son? Probably not, it's being memory holed by the media. But here's a pictorial summary View attachment 12241