and get my picture taken next to blackpool towermaybe time to grow a moustache?
But I suppose the main way I coped with it at the time was to see the history of philosophy as a sort of buggery or (it comes to the same thing) immaculate conception. I saw myself as taking an author from behind and giving him a child that would be his own offspring, yet monstrous. It was really important for it to be his own child, because the author had to actually say all I had him saying. But the child was bound to be monstrous too, because it resulted from all sorts of shifting, slipping, dislocations and hidden emissions that I really enjoyed
you're just showing yourself up gusdeleuze (noun, plural): in American English, "bathrooms" or "restrooms." Refers to a group of toilets. Can be portapotties etc
could just as easily be artaud thatDeleuze letter to Michel Cressole
bear in mind there are no organs within that body anywayBuggery rarely leads to conception, unless you insist on rupturing an orifice wall
Yeah, I'm not convinced AO needs to be as long as it is either.This ATP book has a lot of words couldn't they have written it a bit more efficiently?
Poststructuralism? Or just Deleuze?I think I hate this stuff now.
NEVER STOP READING FRENCH THEORY.French theory.