blissblogger said:
303, i always think of as being like a classic guitar sound, wah wah or fuzztone, you can get peeople who make it fresh again, but the odds against ithat rise with each passing year. also it now unavoidably connotes vintage sound, a certain period feel, as opposed to that absolute gobsmacking fist-of-the-future-in-yer-face sensation of hearing it for the first time in (in my case) 1988
Your point is probably right, but examples like wah wah and fuzztone are far too narrow to capture the potential of the 303 (or similar sounds/machines), let alone the incredibly many ways it have been used. It's both a sound and a way of using that sound... after all, you can make acid without the 303 (anyone in doubt, check the amazing Black Labs album on Thomas Heckmanns Trope label), and you can use the 303 and still not make acid. If the analogy with fuzz/wah wah should hold, then in addition to all the other uses of the sound, there would have to be an entire style of rock with that single sonic trick as the only defining ingredient.
Rather, I think acid could be better described as something like funk - at the same time a genre, a way of playing, and in many ways also a sound.
blissblogger said:
never made a track, got no musical talent whatsoever!
Oh, but we're talking electronics here, you obviously don't need talent. Everybody knows that you just have to press a button.
blissblogger said:
i don't underestimate how hard it is to do something new ...
My experience is that something really new has a very hard time, nobody knows what to do with it (including me - where should I send a demo of something that doesn't sound much like anything else, who would be interested in that? You know those labels always saying: "Only send us something we have never heard before, we don't want something we allready know..."? Well, that's crap, they're not interested in something so different that they can't sell it to their usual audience... Either that, or my music is just bad).