But isn't that what happened with evolution? If humans do indeed have free-will which I'm guessing you're assuming here.basically theres a notion here which presupposes a kind of magic, like theres a set of levels where you can stack complexity together and at a certain point it transforms itself into something completely different
his real name is wayne, dean, gary, scott, alex, paul.He was very open when he first joined actually. Very trusting you weren't here so you don't remember, his real name is Edward
I always have it in my head that Version is from Manchester or a satellite town thereof.
it's not a question of AI being new - it's whether it is in fact possible, or plausible. what you are proposing is that a deterministic process, at a sufficient level of complexity, will escape its determinism somehow, and become non-deterministic. but there's no precedent, or theoretical explanation, for this. it's just a counter-intuitive notion, which for whatever reason you find appealingThat the actual new is unforeseeable? Cause we can only draw from what we know, and thus only have old tools to describe the new? Prognosis only has the old at is disposal when approximating the new?
is that what happened with evolution? there were a bunch of mathematical functions which got more complex somehow and then became humans?But isn't that what happened with evolution? If humans do indeed have free-will which I'm guessing you're assuming here.
it's a lovely death fantasy for us, we lap it upanyway, point is AI is
it's not a question of AI being new - it's whether it is in fact possible, or plausible. what you are proposing is that a deterministic process, at a sufficient level of complexity, will escape its determinism somehow, and become non-deterministic. but there's no precedent, or theoretical explanation, for this. it's just a counter-intuitive notion, which for whatever reason you find appealing
more smoke and mirrors, he's playing you like a cat with a mouseMy dad's from Salford.
I mean that an increase in complexity seemingly begat first life and then free-will.is that what happened with evolution? there were a bunch of mathematical functions which got more complex somehow and then became humans?
Yeah I'm currently working within a framework that has the human evolving all way up from basic particles. So evolution into and through the biological.Me and vim don't believe in evolution. It's a load of bollocks that theory
This would be near my understanding of a materialist cosmology, which is largely what I think is worth exploring. Materialist in such a way as to believe in science for the most part, without being confined by scientism.I mean that an increase in complexity seemingly begat first life and then free-will.