I received this info today from Saveparliament.org ....
This is the latest update on the Legislative and Regulatory Refom Bill (aka
Abolition of Parliament Bill). For more information and constantly updated list
of resources, visit the site at
www.saveparliament.org.uk.
We have a lot to tell you about!
Since our last bulletin the Government announced a huge climbdown on the bill,
recognising there were some concerns and committing to reconsider the bill to
fit the 'Better Regulation Agenda'.
Since that announcement we have been waiting for the next move and finally, on
4th May, the Government published a list of amendments which will be voted on in
the Commons on Monday 15th and Tuesday 16th.
Our initial reaction to the amendments was literally, "We've Won!" but after
careful and detailed scrutiny by ourselves and a number of law professors we
have uncovered that the bill still threatens democracy in much the same way.
The Government has added the much requested veto which can be used in the
Commons as well as the Lords. They have also limited the bill to regulatory
functions.
However, the delegation aspect still remains in the bill and there is only a
limited list of excluded acts so as to ensure that core constitutional
enactments cannot be amended by order.
The most worrying of the amendments is the use of the Law Commission. A minister
may implement Law Commission recommendations 'with or without' changes'. This
means the minister can used the bill to amend legislation based on the
minister's inital idea, regardless of the recommendation from the Law
Commission. The bill also threatens the independence of the Law Commission,
which presents a huge threat to civil liberties.
The bill still does not mention business, which means a burden can be anything a
minister considers to be such, unless it affects only a minister or Government
department. If a minister considers that trial by jury is a burden on the
police, it could be abolished, for example.
An addition brought in with the amendments gives the power to abitrarily shuffle
around regulatory functions. A good example would be the BBC, whose board of
governors could be abolished if a minister so wished.
The bill is still raising concerns about time limits, also. The committee will
only have 30 days to consider an order which is not long enough, especially if
many orders are introduced around the same time.
What happens now?
-----------------
The bill is now returning to the main chamber of the House of Commons for it's
Third Reading, which is scheduled for the afternoons of Monday 15th May, and
Tuesday 16th May. If you have time, you are encouraged to log on to the
parliament.uk website and watch the debate live, or read the transcripts the
following day on TheyWorkForYou.com.
http://www.parliament.uk/
http://www.theyworkforyou.com/
The debate will proceed like the Committee Stage before, where some amendments
are brought before the house which are either dismissed, accepted or voted on.
The amendments brought by the minister in charge, Jim Murphy MP, will all pass,
and those proposed by anyone else will all fail. The list of proposed amendments
is available here:
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200605/cmbills/141/amend/60509a01.htm
The amendments will be read or skipped over in the order that they are
presented. Clauses 1 and 2 are expected to be entirely replaced. The first
amendment in the list is to present a new clause replacing clause 1. When it is
"Read a Second Time", it is up for consideration. The subsequent amendments
(a)-(e) are proposed amendments to this new clause. These have the potential to
change the clause, but they will all be rejected, because the Government
believes it's version is perfect. It will then be "Read a Third Time" and
inserted into the bill. The game roughly proceeds like that for the remainder of
the day.
To follow the proceedings effectively, you may want to print out the version of
the bill as it stands before the debate, and tick things off with a pen as they
go through and change it:
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200506/cmbills/141/06141.i-ii.html
We will be tracking the progress of this stage as it happens on our blog which
you can find at
http://bill111.wordpress.com/.
Unfortunately, the way these things are presented makes very simple things
highly confusing - perhaps to keep the public uninvolved! Indeed, if you don't
understand what's going on we'd urge you to write to your MP and bring the
matter to their attention as they are ultimately responsible for the
presentation to the public and can change it.
We'll issue another bulletin next week to let you know how things went in the
Commons if you don't get chance to look at either of the sites above.
What can you do now?
--------------------
In the meantime, we strongly urge you to e-mail your MP as soon as possible to
express dissatisfaction with the amendments which do not limit the powers in the
bill effectively enough. We recommend you urge your MP to vote in favour of any
amendments proposed by the opposition parties and vote against the entire bill
should they be rejected.
Cheers,
Phil Peter
Director, Save Parliament
http://www.saveparliament.org.uk
