maybe not as much wrong "about" as much as maybe wrong in my handling of the situation.
i'm referring of course, to events that took place on this and following pages.
which may have lead to Vimothy's departure from this forum.
so he is a bush lover. so he is, maybe unknowingly, a racist and a pro-milliatary neo-con. so he sides with state terrorism and apologizes for mass murder. but maybe he also sparked heated debates which are worthwhile to all.
what do you think?
while i don't intend to ever budge from my stance and convictions, and will never stop regarding people who hold views as his as my mortal enemies, was i being intolerant and a bit fascist in my personal attacks against him?
i wish to be just and fair, but at the same time i have zero tolerance for what i view as morally deplorable behavior and those that defend them. where to draw the line?
honestly, if most feel that i was being too harsh, i am capable of issuing a public apology for my personal attacks...
i'm referring of course, to events that took place on this and following pages.
which may have lead to Vimothy's departure from this forum.
so he is a bush lover. so he is, maybe unknowingly, a racist and a pro-milliatary neo-con. so he sides with state terrorism and apologizes for mass murder. but maybe he also sparked heated debates which are worthwhile to all.
what do you think?
while i don't intend to ever budge from my stance and convictions, and will never stop regarding people who hold views as his as my mortal enemies, was i being intolerant and a bit fascist in my personal attacks against him?
i wish to be just and fair, but at the same time i have zero tolerance for what i view as morally deplorable behavior and those that defend them. where to draw the line?
honestly, if most feel that i was being too harsh, i am capable of issuing a public apology for my personal attacks...