Mr. Tea
Let's Talk About Ceps
hey what do y'all think of cyril smith
luka r u keen on him trying to link back up hermeticism/gnosis and marx
A vile nonce of epic proportions, by all accounts. Why'd you bring him up?
hey what do y'all think of cyril smith
luka r u keen on him trying to link back up hermeticism/gnosis and marx
poor vim. i thought he was vague and non-committal, but here he's making proper concrete statements. his vagueness is out of fatigue with being harangued and a healthy, well deserved contempt for everyone on the forum.
https://libcom.org/library/karl-marx-human-self-creation-cyril-smithA vile nonce of epic proportions, by all accounts. Why'd you bring him up?
One for the Finchley Shaik
So specifically with Vim and others like him,there's a kicking out at the tyranny, the intolerance of liberalism, with liberalism as the stifling, all pervasive dominant ideology, impossible to escape from. And it's kept quite abstract usually, quite vague and suggestive but you do have to ask yourself what freedoms, specifically, do these people want to claim for themselves? What personal desires are being thwarted? Because more often than not its something grubby and tawdry like the 'right' to be a racist or whatever. The abstraction is grounded in something, always.
theres never been a left wing or anti capaitalist consensus on dissensus, ever.
Some of the strongest voices have always been far right voices like craners. I don't have a problem with this. I think it's helpful for everyone involved.
It’s a bit like this weird idea that people on dissensus hate rock and love rap, rnb and dancehall when in actuality everyone there’s about three of us like those things and the stuff that gets the most traction is dbeat, Bob Dylan and arcade fire
hey what do y'all think of cyril smith
luka r u keen on him trying to link back up hermeticism/gnosis and marx
A vile nonce of epic proportions, by all accounts. Why'd you bring him up?
"‘Neoliberalism’ and ‘financialisation’ are expressions favoured by opportunists in their efforts to avoid using the word ‘imperialism’. Such terms are at best descriptive, more usually a smokescreen to disguise theoretical barrenness and in the end, a way of smuggling in their support for Keynesian solutions to the crisis which are then described as socialist."
how accurate would u say this is