SR about wonky - which we've already established isn't a genre - being illbient + internet.
Haha! That "Hardcore Recontinuum" diagram is the one, basically.
http://splinteringboneashes.blogspot.com/
this guy is the only one with the lack of baggage as a music critic and cultural commentator, and the only one without the weight of ideology, with no theories to put on whether it's realness / the nuum / or hauntology, who's actually trying to quietly make sense of it all and succeeding by looking for places where the nuum doesn't work and the right and other ideas and theories do, he's mutating it.
tomorrow we can expect another glimpse from behind the 'net curtains from SR about wonky - which we've already established isn't a genre - being illbient + internet.
i love how dubstep has a little loop that comes back on itself! lol
i don't follow the jacques lu cont one, sorry. someone explain!
who made these anyway??
yeah, really interesting (and admirably inventive) take there from Alex, as always.
Oh yeah, it's because of the inherent contradiction at the heart of the libidinal matrix of late capitalism --
yeah I kind of glanced askance at this as well. not at the idea of creativity as a scarce resource which can be tapped out, which is at least interesting (in a very abstract sense) if nothing else.
Well, yes, they're spoiled, but why are they spoiled? Isn't this actually acknowledging that there indeed was a greater amount of incredible stuff coming out in the golden age of rave, at a much faster speed? Og course, this is not the same as to say that the current stuff isn't great, just that theres less of it and that it's moving slower.As I said before, it all adds up to: spoiled brats (read: 'bloggers' & UK music 'critics' ) in the age of capitalism: I want MORE STUFF, and I want it NOW dammit, .. more more more goes the complaint , to happen FASTER and FASTER;,
again too most of the people making musi now were 8 or 9 when jungle was about, so they're partly being criticised for not being born it would seem to me.
who said that 'speed of mutation' is the criterion by which individual tracks or a community or a genre are to be judged?
i find it funny how teh bloggers exhibit perfectly the capitalist-driven desire they rail against - a perfect symmetry of meaningless shite if you ask me: capitalist market, meet your offspring: music bloggers complaining that music doesn't change fast enough - b/c if it changed faster then a blogger could lecture us about its CULTURAL RELEVANCE , even tho there's more music more mutation more releases in any given genre than a person cld listen to in ten years ...
and fair enough too...again too most of the people making musi now were 8 or 9 when jungle was about, so they're partly being criticised for not being born it would seem to me.