not because i care but b/c there is basic principle of argumentation here -
nomadologist first says:
The supprt 4 which supposdly comes from:
Honstly I am beginning to theink that u r out of your fking mind.
nomadologist first says:
That's (a) "both" K-Punk and SR who (b) "CLEARLY and EMPHATICALY state" that (c) "ALL INNOVATION IN ELECTRONIC MUSIC" for (d) "the PAST 20 YEARS" is (e) "thanks only to JUNGLE and the HARDCORE CONTINUUM."Did you watch the presentation or read Kpunk's FACT article? Because I did, and both CLEARLY and EMPHATICALLY state that ALL INNOVATION IN ELECTRONIC MUSIC for the PAST 20 YEARS is thanks only to JUNGLE and the HARDCORE CONTINUUM.
The supprt 4 which supposdly comes from:
The quote says not one single thing (a, b, c, d, or e) that you attribute to it.There is perhaps an element of generational resentment too: a generation younger than Reynolds is frustrated that it has yet to produce a music which can’t be comfortably fitted inside a theoretical framework generated nearly two decades ago. It’s a measure of the robustness of the hardcore continuum (and its theorization) that it should still be holding on after twenty years. Yet it’s also a sign of the slowing of the rate of innovation in popular music, with British dance music, once so furiously inventive, now falling prey to the conditions of entropy which have long prevailed elsewhere. If only there could be a shattering break that would definitively relegate the hardcore continuum to the past…
Honstly I am beginning to theink that u r out of your fking mind.