Possibly not - but then again, the question of how systems are changed is not a simple one. Popular mobilization, followed by revolution, does provide an answer to this question - and it is true that revolutions do effect changes, even if these are seldom the changes desired, or dreamed about later. Broadly, Klein seems to believe in the importance of the task of raising consciousness of the - precisely - evil consequences of the ideas which underpin the present system. This idea clearly rests on a lot of assumptions - about the role of ideas, the morality of ideas, the idea that some ideas are morally better than others. Some of these assumptions might even be true. But when they are explicitly stated (as, for instance, Chomsky does in his interview with Foucault) they seem in many ways naive and pious. And then there is, again, the eternal question of the relationship of the movement to its leaders and theorists, and the politics involved in that positioning. If it is really the case that universal justice is an idea coming to us from the academy, and a heavy investment in theory, or from a professional magazine journalist, and a heavy investment in media currency, then certain political structures follow from that, and certain relationships are implied. It seems to me that these aspects don't tend to be widely considered.