The anti-presets thing - is this a consequence of presets sounding shit generally or a case of being original/having your own 'sound'? Was just kicking a wretched little theory around the moth-ball-belching corridors of my brain-block... the search for originality in music originally revolving around how sounds are used, before originality becomes about WHICH sounds are used... and then it short-circuited and I started wondering if farts dream.
I've hardly ever found any presets which don't suck totally, although there was one called pop square which I found on my emu x that sounded to my ears like that grime lead used on more or less everything a few years back (and maybe still now, not really urban/upper middle-class enough for this grime thing
I was chatting about this a while back (and I think made a brief mention in the dogme dj's thread), that it would be interesting to see what people come up with given only very basic soundsets and limits on what fx could be used to see what producers could come up with. Should make people think more in terms of arrangement, harmony, melody and groove.
I always feel that the music that I always feel inspired by has more to do with certain familiar elements being used in new ways - taking something as simple as a sine wave, fender rhodes, kick and snare and hats and shakers and you should be able to make house, 2 step, funky, hip hop, whatever. It's interesting to place limitations on these things sometimes to limit the crippling effects of option anxiety on the tune writing process. I suppose a lot of this could be coming from a non-electronic background though, things have to be more distinctive musically when you have limited instrumentation.